[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9126 (7410)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 31 March 2023 19:56 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDC7C1522D3 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.647
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.647 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VgM0mPcJCp7 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DD22C151551 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 1C6AD4C288; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: adrii.deinega@gmail.com, torsten@lodderstedt.net, bcampbell@pingidentity.com, nat@sakimura.org, dave@tonge.org, panva.ip@gmail.com, oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230331195602.1C6AD4C288@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:56:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/MQUu3YhcBX6P7EMeJ4bNVqH7ooo>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9126 (7410)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 19:56:06 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9126, "OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7410 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Andrii Deinega <adrii.deinega@gmail.com> Section: 1.1 Original Text ------------- Uses "urn:example:bwc4JK-ESC0w8acc191e-Y1LTC2" in two examples. Corrected Text -------------- Use "urn:ietf:params:oauth:request_uri:bwc4JK-ESC0w8acc191e-Y1LTC2" instead. Notes ----- Some may find the use of "urn:example:" a bit misleading. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9126 (draft-ietf-oauth-par-10) -------------------------------------- Title : OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests Publication Date : September 2021 Author(s) : T. Lodderstedt, B. Campbell, N. Sakimura, D. Tonge, F. Skokan Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9126 (7… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC912… Chris Smiley