Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertions (was Agenda Proposal)
Chuck Mortimore <cmortimore@salesforce.com> Wed, 14 March 2012 23:03 UTC
Return-Path: <cmortimore@salesforce.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2BA21F87EE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vaTJbjZxfcT6 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod8og101.obsmtp.com (exprod8og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.3.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E31B21F87CA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exsfm-hub5.internal.salesforce.com ([204.14.239.233]) by exprod8ob101.postini.com ([64.18.7.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT2EjpDf0lKWZPeG6qLrmBGuAgzv41NBO@postini.com; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:03:00 PDT
Received: from EXSFM-MB03.internal.salesforce.com ([10.1.127.57]) by exsfm-hub5.internal.salesforce.com ([10.1.127.5]) with mapi; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:03:00 -0700
From: Chuck Mortimore <cmortimore@salesforce.com>
To: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:02:58 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Assertions (was Agenda Proposal)
Thread-Index: Ac0CNbHhb5CT9jv+RlWPJpW2kRW9/AAAOcAa
Message-ID: <CB8671B2.28A2A%cmortimore@salesforce.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+k3eCQe2d2PcyVtHoy-40vHwJuRDTuwMJJbHpLJPekFp_Lvrw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CB8671B228A2Acmortimoresalesforcecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertions (was Agenda Proposal)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:03:02 -0000
I'll be there to help support this part of the discussion as well. -cmort On 3/14/12 3:49 PM, "Brian Campbell" <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> wrote: Unfortunately I will not be in Paris for the Thrus meeting but I'd love to see the assertion drafts progress. So thanks to Hannes for putting it on the agenda and to Mike for owning that portion of it. There's been some light discussion on this list around the assertion stuff but, as far as I know, there's only been one question raised that might potentially involve changes: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08298.html Just a nit/clarification that while draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns is used by draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer, it is intended to have a broader scope and not just limited to assertions. It should be a means of registering urn:ietf:params:oauth:* URNs for any OAuth related specifications or extensions that might need one. On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote: > Feedback appreciated! > > 3. OAuth Assertions (Mike) > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-assertions/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns/ _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Assertions (was Agenda Proposal) Chuck Mortimore
- [OAUTH-WG] Assertions (was Agenda Proposal) Brian Campbell