[OAUTH-WG] [Errata Verified] RFC8707 (6810)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 20 January 2022 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056873A147A; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:49:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9MGRJk7bd15; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:49:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50D383A147E; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:49:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 35ABD622CF6; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:49:51 -0800 (PST)
To: jan@jangoebel.com, brian.d.campbell@gmail.com, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rdd@cert.org, iesg@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220120144951.35ABD622CF6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:49:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/NCDdaXo8bfwHzOAKlz2S6hwt1UM>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Errata Verified] RFC8707 (6810)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 14:49:56 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8707,
"Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6810

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Jan Goebel <jan@jangoebel.com>
Date Reported: 2022-01-05
Verified by: Roman Danyliw (IESG)

Section: 4

Original Text
-------------
In typical OAuth deployments the authorization sever is in a position
to observe and track a significant amount of user and client behavior.

Corrected Text
--------------
In typical OAuth deployments, the authorization server is in a position
to observe and track a significant amount of user and client behavior.

Notes
-----
1. typo: sever -> server
2. I think we also need a comma after "In typical OAuth deployments" because it is an introductory phrase, but maybe a native English speaker can confirm.

--------------------------------------
RFC8707 (draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0
Publication Date    : February 2020
Author(s)           : B. Campbell, J. Bradley, H. Tschofenig
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG