Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Thu, 27 February 2014 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3801A065C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:48:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1yHL9tOsKzvX for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FE41A065D for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:48:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u56so3344594wes.17 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:48:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=VD6FG+2Fxqlqfyzgw9hCOqGG8kW7ijSGc/+31lo5OXI=; b=buSsHF0FFxqczuOTvk3wNJpwpyzDgIl7416BXHNig37YhuIy9apzT6RWQ25sklBZkV wZWsqxwVdvf7NLrL3yVxHWQ37zeamO6lXzvTTzuIxpvPhvUsvW8ec+zy3+t6HBY1s/K1 ++rvoQZyVynvifWywRf5bXQPF+ZAkW3whNBedF7gDIYAiKEDeR7dx2niFK/ZNR2bHQ5K qw+IL4Q/NoCdYjCyELjZT718zQCoCrD7Bc8nFxuTHGBWZMCCYy7iaiiI4mDaPBonMbr6 1eg4R2boonaA6cAFVvcVToAH0rmNN+ZSARNEphpPWhNDKmjHcZ4mbgYTwFwqMeeoqSih MgKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn982KFJkRKw+W8/ndOvdSM6QAMcdmzIEIqsAUTAM+DYOCUfG4tDq0uaGwpK2ciss2mdEz5
X-Received: by 10.194.82.105 with SMTP id h9mr9313665wjy.52.1393530483979; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:48:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.50.167] (80.224.32.125.static.user.ono.com. [80.224.32.125]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm18082824wiv.2.2014.02.27.11.48.00 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7564E9EB-852C-4591-AFC3-5C89B59C36FB"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402260914330.17543@hiroshima.bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 20:48:01 +0100
Message-Id: <C44AAD43-BB8B-4547-B4F9-41A1D56066FC@ve7jtb.com>
References: <trinity-b18ee9df-fc39-4e6a-93f5-79860dd74517-1393348985156@3capp-gmx-bs24> <CA+k3eCR7ShHN7Gmg=6_4Ap3kRZnFsk=79YcEchTOSVF5mr7hLQ@mail.gmail.com> <3818574F-C5EF-42E7-A692-8FBDFC3E75DA@ve7jtb.com> <CA+k3eCQCP9mc8y-gVCTUOG92tJ5X9C19Xy5X7Zm0p8X0zDo2ww@mail.gmail.com> <334fb1d7c15d4c92839b7799929c05ff@BLUPR03MB309.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <7DFFB4D1-3086-4C33-A0B7-7B6A5A1841C5@ve7jtb.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1402260914330.17543@hiroshima.bogus.com>
To: Lucy Lynch <lynch@isoc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Nff6CRlAfBg59-FZP7W5UQH8IEc
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:48:09 -0000

The Connect WG has a time 1pm - 3pm agenda and attendance confirmation page.   https://openid-ietf-89.eventbrite.com

Durring the Proof of possession call Jan 28 there was consensus to have a F2F to discuss the drafts prior to the WG meeting. 
Some people were not arriving until the afternoon so on the call we decided to ask the IETF to extend the room for the Connect meeting to 5pm so that we could meet from 3-5 pm.

I subsequently made the noon to 5pm room request on the 28th.

At some point after that the OAuth WG chair contacted Lucy asking for the meeting to be from 10 - 3pm due to a conflict he had in the afternoon.

I am not a chair or any other furniture of the OAuth WG.   If people are unavailable in the morning and want to discuss OAuth things after the Connect meeting as originally planned and the room is available I will be there. 

Pleas direct further questions regarding OAuth meeting times to the appropriate furniture.

Deepest Regards
John B.

On Feb 26, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Lucy Lynch <lynch@isoc.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014, John Bradley wrote:
> 
>> I asked for the room from 12 to 5.  The chair had the time changed so we reserved the room from 10 to 3pm.
>> 
>> We would need to talk to Lucy to see if we could have the time extended past 3 for additional OAuth related meetings.
>> 
>> I don't know if the room is booked for something else after 3 but we could likely find out.
> 
> I can check - it would help if everyone agreed on times and topics.
> 
>> John B.
>> 
>> On Feb 26, 2014, at 1:57 AM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Agree, the OAUTH meeting should change to afternoon
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:56 PM
>>> To: John Bradley
>>> Cc: oauth
>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth + Open ID Connect Meeting: Sunday, March 2
>>> 
>>> Yes, I'm familiar with life and I'm aware that things do change. And I have no doubt that scheduling this stuff is more than a little difficult. But with these Sunday meetings and the vast majority of us traveling internationally, it'd be really helpful if the timing can be nailed down as early as is reasonable and changes can be avoided.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:58 PM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:
>>>> Yes.
>>>> 
>>>> Things change that's life.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 25, 2014, at 8:16 PM, Brian Campbell
>>>> <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Wasn't this originally announced with a different start time and
>>>> Connect and OAuth happening in the opposite order?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
>>>> <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Lucy organized a room for our informal discussion about OAuth
>>>>> (followed by the OpenID Connect meeting). We will start at 10am and
>>>>> the room is reserved till 3pm. Palace C is the meeting room. At some
>>>>> point in time the OAuth meeting will turn into the OpenID Connect
>>>>> meeting. For those who are interested I will give a privacy tutorial at 3pm in the Blenheim room.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mike, Nat, John, and others might have more information about the
>>>>> agenda for the OpenID Connect meeting. For the OAuth meeting Derek
>>>>> and I were planning to use the time to prepare the security
>>>>> discussions for the official OAuth WG meeting. I am sure we will
>>>>> arrange further meeting slots during the week to give enough room for
>>>>> socializing and generating new ideas.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ciao
>>>>> Hannes
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OAuth mailing list
>>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>>