[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9126 (7254)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 18 November 2022 18:23 UTC

To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: joseph@heenan.me.uk, torsten@lodderstedt.net, bcampbell@pingidentity.com, nat@sakimura.org, dave@tonge.org, panva.ip@gmail.com, oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20221118182346.CAB7755F7E@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 10:23:46 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/ObjyQhxNrMeMRFI9iGc3PfHtw4w>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9126 (7254)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9126,
"OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7254

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Joseph Heenan <joseph@heenan.me.uk>

Section: 1.1

Original Text
-------------
POST /as/par HTTP/1.1
Host: as.example.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

&response_type=code
&client_id=CLIENT1234&state=duk681S8n00GsJpe7n9boxdzen
<...>

Corrected Text
--------------
POST /as/par HTTP/1.1
Host: as.example.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded

response_type=code
&client_id=CLIENT1234&state=duk681S8n00GsJpe7n9boxdzen
<...>

Notes
-----
In the 'Introductory Example', the POST body to the par endpoint contains an unnecessary '&' at the start. (It's perhaps technically valid, but could potentially confuse readers.)

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC9126 (draft-ietf-oauth-par-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests
Publication Date    : September 2021
Author(s)           : T. Lodderstedt, B. Campbell, N. Sakimura, D. Tonge, F. Skokan
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9126 (7… RFC Errata System
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC912… Chris Smiley