[OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Feedback Needed!
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 30 January 2014 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB821A0504 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:08:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_24_48=1.34, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2B3bLwmHyVlp for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A891A04FD for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 01:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.205] ([213.162.68.81]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MXI5V-1VoG6A02E9-00WH9K for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:08:27 +0100
Message-ID: <52E87DE4.1070000@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:04:52 +0000
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: oauth@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="m6V4NT39wk5fnLaPB0JnE0TqKhPvwsGJC"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:t7OCdMEOWuQnT82sMaru5IGctqW9fPjS3X5PN9jyUEc4Awnpct6 BCIazchZJxbQmn1SX9VTBbekmgZ4Pd7sn70VJedgL7+Fu7/46lmC7L78ht0NhAUMbAq1XdX Sp1IzFlu4dKTqUuJCTISFPoGD2rgImjzpy37R8d/FADO/bPa23rVNBiC61HfQZ9lDTMyotE QKlKq3fN8mq/csO+hpvOg==
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Feedback Needed!
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:08:34 -0000
Hi all, as you have seen from the meeting minutes of our recent status chat it is time to proceed with the dynamic client registration work. The earlier version of the dynamic client registration document was split into three parts, namely (1) the current working group draft containing only minimal functionality, (2) a document describing meta-data, and (3) a document containing management functionality. This change was made as outcome of the discussions we had more or less over the last 9 months. The latter two documents are individual submissions at this point. New content is not available with the recent changes. So, it is one of those document management issues. I had a chat with Stephen about WG adoption of the two individual submissions as WG items. It was OK for him given that it is a purely document management action. However, before we turn the documents into WG items we need your feedback on a number of issues: 1) Do you have concerns with the document split? Do you object or approve it? 2) Is the separation of the functionality into these three documents correct? Should the line be drawn differently? 3) Do you have comments on the documents overall? We would like to receive high-level feedback within a week. We are also eager to hear from implementers and other projects using the dynamic client registration work (such as OpenID Connect, UMA, the BlueButton/GreenButton Initiative, etc.) For more detailed reviews please wait till we re-do the WGLC (which we plan to do soon). We have to restart the WGLC due to discussions last years and the resulting changes to these documents. Ciao Hannes & Derek PS: Derek and I also think that Phil should become co-auhor of these documents for his contributions.
- [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Feedba… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Registration Plan: Your Fe… John Bradley