[OAUTH-WG] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-16: (with COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-mtls-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-mtls/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Section 2.1.2.

Suggest using the IPv6 Address Text Representation described in RFC5952 instead
of using the representations described in RFC4291 section 2.2. The canonical
representation described in RFC5952 makes it easier to compare two IPv6 address
strings which is probably something you want to do while doing mutual
authentication.