[OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83
Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 15:27 UTC
Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9846A21E8209; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.988
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.988 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nmo4hIrIT4Hc; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EEA21E8204; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 08:27:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mocana.ihtfp.org (dhcp-5279.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.82.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cliodev.ihtfp.com", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1638260268; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:27:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by mocana.ihtfp.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2TFR6tE012061; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:27:06 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: saag@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:27:03 -0400
Message-ID: <sjmk423bf7c.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 15:27:13 -0000
Hi, OAUTH met earlier this afternoon in Afternoon Session I at 13h00 for a two hour session. After introducing ourselves and welcoming me to the working group we thanked Barry and Blaine for their service. Torsten spoke about draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel. This document has completed WG Last Call. Torsten has applied changes based on the Last Call Comments and has published a new revision. Barry promised to finish his PROTO Shepard review next week so we can send this document to the IESG. He promises to take Mike Thomas' issues from the list into account and make sure that everyone is happy. [ I'd like to extend a personal thank you to Barry for continuing his role as document shephard for this draft. -- derek ] Next, Mike Jones spoke about the Assertions, SAML2 Bearer, and URN-Sub-NS drafts. Except for one outstanding issue Mike believes these documents are ready for WGLC. Consensus in the room was to take these three docs to WGLC, which the chairs will do by the end of next week. The MAC Token draft has languished while time was spent working on the core document. Eran was not here, nor was he online, to talk about the status of the MAC Token draft. There were only a few people in the room interested in reviewing the draft, which was not a clear consensus of interest, even though this document does solve a problem that the bearer tokens cannot. The chairs will take it to the list to evaluate if there is enough interest to continue with this document. In a related note, this document (as well as the v2-bearer document) is not available off the tools page even though it has not expired. I have taken the action item to get that sorted out. Finally, we spent the majority of our time talking about rechartering based on the proposed charter sent to the list by Hannes a week or two ago. Consensus of the room was that there was enough interest to recharter based roughly on the proposed charter. There was also consensus to include Simple Web Discovery (in addition to, and separate from, Dynamic Client Registration), although we will need to work with the ADs to make sure it gets handled in the appropriate WG and Area. Moreover, it's important to make sure the appropriate applications area participants get involved in the SWD work. Hannes and I will revise the proposed charter and send it out to the WG for additional comments and feedback. Our goal is to send it to the IESG for approval on their April 26th telechat. This would hopefully result in approval on the May 10th chat, after public comment. We finished the meeting at 14h30. -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 Derek Atkins
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 Derek Atkins
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 Derek Atkins
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH Report for IETF-83 Eran Hammer