IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Current Progress in use case document?

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Thu, 22 August 2013 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D346611E8203 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.293
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.293 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.306, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNVqAQRcFi7y for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBF211E8122 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610662602B2; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:17:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07156-03; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:17:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mocana.ihtfp.org (unknown [IPv6:fe80::224:d7ff:fee7:8924]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cliodev.ihtfp.com", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D641260237; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:17:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by mocana.ihtfp.org (8.14.7/8.14.5/Submit) id r7MMHFSr009364; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:17:15 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
References: <OFE117D818.698E0F58-ON48257BBE.0034B640-48257BBE.00353DF2@zte.com.cn> <51FFD820.2050200@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:17:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <51FFD820.2050200@alcatel-lucent.com> (Igor Faynberg's message of "Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:51:44 -0400")
Message-ID: <sjmfvu1pdzo.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Cc: "zachary.zeltsan@gmail.com" <zachary.zeltsan@gmail.com>, oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Current Progress in use case document?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:17:31 -0000

Sorry, I meant to ping about this document but I've been inundated with
"Real Work(TM)" since Berlin.

Alas, the document expired, which means we need a new version submitted
before we can send it through the process.

Can one get submitted, please?

Thanks,

-derek

Igor Faynberg <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com> writes:

> Zhou,
>
> The correct addres for Zachary is on the (corrected) CC list.
>
> My take on it is that the Use Cases document has been ready for approval for
> quite a while, and there were no concerns about misunderstandings. The cases
> are clearly delineated by their respective 1) descriptions, 2) pre-conditions,
> and 3) post-conditions.
>
> I might try to to help, but I don't quite understand what "some diagram" means
> here and why it should be added.  Nor do I understand what your difficulty in
> discerning one use case from another is.   If you see something specifically
> wrong with what is there please point this out. 
>
> If you need a tutorial on Use Cases, please write to Zachary.
>
> With thanks,
>
> Igor
>
> On 8/5/2013 5:40 AM, zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn wrote:
>
>     Hi, all                                                                   
>          The use case documemnt will not be updated?                          
>          For a reader it is very difficult to discern a use case from another 
>     one.                                                                      
>          Could some diagram be added? Could some explanation be added to      
>     clarify why some cases cannot be supperted by oauth 2.0?                  
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OAuth mailing list
>     OAuth@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email