Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests
Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Wed, 18 December 2019 21:24 UTC
Return-Path: <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE171208A3 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:24:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9CX8SRGMVS6 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:24:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52EB120836 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:24:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (static-71-174-62-56.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [71.174.62.56]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id xBILO403013326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:24:04 -0500
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
Message-Id: <FA9BA6E0-F504-4CE8-A85E-EBE1CFA4732B@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6D8FA482-FD8D-46ED-9D60-1FC521852D03"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:24:04 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAGL6epLukFVHYxWcA0y1eQqmcMzrN=X5bp_-09cFeTTJEpj+6A@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAGL6epLukFVHYxWcA0y1eQqmcMzrN=X5bp_-09cFeTTJEpj+6A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/VsifRn91Epygpk4RzBC5cB6P-gM>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 21:24:09 -0000
I support adoption of PAR and have already implemented the draft specification. - Justin > On Dec 17, 2019, at 7:59 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > All, > > This is a call for adoption of for the OAuth 2.0 Pushed Authorization Requests document. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-par/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-par/> > > There was a good support for this document during the Singapore meeting, and on the mailing list in the Meeting Minutes thread. > > Please, let us know if you support or object to adopting this document as a working group document by Dec 27th. > > If you have already indicated your support on the Meeting Minutes thread, you do not need to do it again on this thread. > > Regards, > Rifaat & Hannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushed Au… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Daniel Fett
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Filip Skokan
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Aaron Parecki
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Hans Zandbelt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Vladimir Dzhuvinov
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… David Waite
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… n-sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Dave Tonge
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Joseph Heenan
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Pushe… Torsten Lodderstedt