Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri
Evan Gilbert <uidude@google.com> Fri, 16 April 2010 19:06 UTC
Return-Path: <uidude@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA263A698F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JRpydSmK+m4t for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEC03A69A6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.93]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o3GJ65Ii026344 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:06:05 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1271444765; bh=p8BBte58NG2mkARCyozGQdMW7+0=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=XeqUAVqLF1uf/kHpfOU3WhiFQi8RMD9JvYSAokNRohVhTPt52gptxMBSDSZjqsAct WhwFwDthzpk+0OTYtem7Q==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id: subject:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=YOV7CVZHbVbqEKcPDcAN4Q/PIh++Qcmz1RinMP9hdwJW+Es92MXNVn7J1GMRtwy7i lvDEeYG1txvBniFkm7GJA==
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qwc5.prod.google.com [10.241.193.133]) by wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o3GJ644N030196 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:06:05 -0700
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so806335qwc.16 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.78.131 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2513A610118CC14C8E622C376C8DEC93D54D66DCF5@SC-MBXC1.TheFacebook.com>
References: <9C30AE64-7DB8-4B6B-879B-61CB71BF74BB@facebook.com> <C7EC567E.322EE%eran@hueniverse.com> <2513A610118CC14C8E622C376C8DEC93D54D66DCA7@SC-MBXC1.TheFacebook.com> <CA16E5C8-7987-4D5B-9038-E705E6630A07@bbn.com> <2513A610118CC14C8E622C376C8DEC93D54D66DCF5@SC-MBXC1.TheFacebook.com>
From: Evan Gilbert <uidude@google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:05:43 -0700
Received: by 10.229.211.140 with SMTP id go12mr2799416qcb.32.1271444763260; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 12:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <i2pc8689b661004161205g949c17a1z245fd80199140ea4@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Shepard <lshepard@facebook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016363b806c773c6104845f4d8e"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Naitik Shah <naitik@facebook.com>, OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:06:20 -0000
We should use the same name in the User-Agent and Web Callback flows. Also, although the authorization server won't be allowing JSONP requests, "callback" has become a bit of a defacto standard for JSONP and it would be nice to use a term that isn't overloaded? Can we make them both "redirection"? Even better, maybe "redirect_uri"? On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Luke Shepard <lshepard@facebook.com> wrote: > Facebook API requests are protected resources. They can be called either in > a browser or in a server-to-server environment. > > For example, a JSONP call for my name looks like this: > > > https://api.facebook.com/restserver.php?api_key=361900759629&call_id=1271436355034&callback=FB.RestServer._callback&format=json&method=fql.query&query=SELECT%20name%20FROM%20user%20WHERE%20uid%3D2901279&v=1.0 > > The output (you can play with it here: > http://fbrell.com/fb.api/everyone-data ): > > FB.RestServer._callback([{"name":"Luke Shepard"}]); > > If we want that protected resource to take an access token as well, then it > would look like: > > > https://api.facebook.com/restserver.php?....&callback=FB.RestServer._callback&access_token=ACCESS_TOKEN > > The "callback" parameter is used pretty universally for JSONP requests. For > instance, see the Jquery docs: http://api.jquery.com/jQuery.getJSON/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes@bbn.com] > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 9:10 AM > To: Luke Shepard > Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; Naitik Shah; OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri > > Could you clarify a little more the environment in which this > confusion arose? What do you mean when you say "The protected > resource typically accepts 'callback' as a parameter to support > JSONP."? What sort of software are you including in this? > > --Richard > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Luke Shepard wrote: > > > We already had one developer try it out and get confused because the > > server tried to treat the callback URL as a JSONP callback. > > > > The protected resource typically accepts "callback" as a parameter > > to support JSONP. If a developer accidentally passes in callback > > there (maybe they got confused) then the server can't give a normal > > error message - instead it needs to either detect that it looks like > > a URL or otherwise reject it. > > > > On a related note, I think it's more confusing calling it something > > different in the user-agent flow (redirector) when it's essentially > > doing the same thing. > > > > > > From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of Eran Hammer-Lahav > > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:37 AM > > To: Naitik Shah; OAuth WG > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri > > > > I don't think it is that confusing. Its a completely different > > context from where JSON-P is used (note that in the User-Agent flow > > it is called something else). > > > > EHL > > > > > > On 4/10/10 12:35 PM, "Naitik Shah" <naitik@facebook.com> wrote: > > > > With the simplified params, the callback url parameter is now just > > "callback". Since most major API providers already use "callback" to > > signify JSON-P callback, can we rename this to "callback_uri"? This > > will help avoid collisions and confusion. > > > > > > -Naitik > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
- [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Naitik Shah
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Richard Barnes
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Evan Gilbert
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Richard Barnes
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Evan Gilbert
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Evan Gilbert
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Naitik Shah
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Evan Gilbert
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Rename callback => callback_uri Eran Hammer-Lahav