IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Mon, 19 September 2011 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0388721F8CBB for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:50:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBNg4iKM4eNb for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0769621F8C71 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18938 invoked from network); 19 Sep 2011 18:52:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.20) by p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 19 Sep 2011 18:52:54 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT002.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.20]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:52:44 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>, Chuck Mortimore <cmortimore@salesforce.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 11:52:37 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt
Thread-Index: Acx2/Nm6pT3jkKb6Rz6IQePqNBuuqAAACTsA
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345213D92A5D@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <20110916192014.6501.87499.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E73A431.2020205@lodderstedt.net> <19099790-0E64-4F08-80D5-FC2DFD903AD2@salesforce.com> <CAGdjJpLsYzuCNBVKcjPZgHKLSvD9rtacvGTrNh7Mjd-auY0VNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGdjJpLsYzuCNBVKcjPZgHKLSvD9rtacvGTrNh7Mjd-auY0VNg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72345213D92A5DP3PW5EX1MB01E_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:50:33 -0000

Just a general note: you don't need every spec to become a working group item. If you get an area director to sponsor your draft, you can push it through sooner as an individual submission. Sometimes you don't even need sponsorship.

I'm not saying this out of any objection to the WG taking on this work, just that I don't see a reason to wait. If you feel this simple document is ready and has consensus, you should find a sponsor and move to IETF LC.

EHL


From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marius Scurtescu
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:48 AM
To: Chuck Mortimore
Cc: OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt

+1
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Chuck Mortimore <cmortimore@salesforce.com<mailto:cmortimore@salesforce.com>> wrote:
If it's not already implicit by our implementation, I'm voicing our support for this becoming a working group item.

- cmort

On Sep 16, 2011, at 12:31 PM, "Torsten Lodderstedt" <torsten@lodderstedt.net<mailto:torsten@lodderstedt.net>> wrote:
Hi all,

I just published a new revision of the token revocation draft. We added JSONP support (thanks to Marius) and aligned the text with draft 21 of the core spec.

We would like to bring this draft forward as working group item (once the WG is ready). We think its relevance is illustrated by the fact that this draft (or its predecessor) has already been implemented by Google, Salesforce, and Deutsche Telekom.

regards,
Torsten.

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff:

New Version Notification for draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt

Datum:

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:20:14 -0700

Von:

internet-drafts@ietf.org<mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>

An:

torsten@lodderstedt.net<mailto:torsten@lodderstedt.net>

CC:

sdronia@gmx.de<mailto:sdronia@gmx.de>, torsten@lodderstedt.net<mailto:torsten@lodderstedt.net>, mscurtescu@google.com<mailto:mscurtescu@google.com>



A new version of I-D, draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Torsten Lodderstedt and posted to the IETF repository.



Filename:        draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation

Revision:        03

Title:           Token Revocation

Creation date:   2011-09-16

WG ID:           Individual Submission

Number of pages: 6



Abstract:

   This draft proposes an additional endpoint for OAuth authorization

   servers for revoking tokens.









The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email