[OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7662 (7607)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 17 August 2023 18:42 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DD7C15152B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.468
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.468 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rBay82JR6knX for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FC8FC14CE29 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 612BB88BC9; Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: ietf@justin.richer.org, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, hannes.tschofenig@arm.com, rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: sunfulong@neusoft.edu.cn, oauth@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230817184251.612BB88BC9@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:42:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/bdJeBb1H5X4aC_Uhb8BCopY0bPA>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7662 (7607)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 18:42:55 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7662, "OAuth 2.0 Token Introspection". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7607 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Fulong Sun <sunfulong@neusoft.edu.cn> Section: 2.2 Original Text ------------- a given token has been issued by this authorization server, has not been revoked by the resource owner, and is within its given time window of validity Corrected Text -------------- a given token has been issued by this authorization server, has not been revoked by the resource owner or client, and is within its given time window of validity Notes ----- RFC 7009 defined a given token can be revoke by client, so should write client here. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC7662 (draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-11) -------------------------------------- Title : OAuth 2.0 Token Introspection Publication Date : October 2015 Author(s) : J. Richer, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7662 (7… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC766… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC766… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC766… Warren Parad