IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Token Binding for OAuth 2.0

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Tue, 16 August 2016 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2C312B041 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pingidentity.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wiRM7XbpiWF4 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4150412B00B for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id q83so115811751iod.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pingidentity.com; s=gmail; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tRrRWneaCyc0r0oX0XGGunvc0bQ7dRmpEaTAd9bxtSc=; b=VIECTsUad3XPh0ZBMVHM8n7Wc8+Ws4Woo6jri00louxYLrZJJZdSQiWqpPzPfNfBlK HSypOr3GD4vi/lqBs4t1qsXLTxV2UAYKD/E/DaB8+IS0Faf/FllVXa6KYRBXkb+FD/WZ 9bzgQ29qwH4EaMwBV5E6y7l+UmmpTG1xea/xU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tRrRWneaCyc0r0oX0XGGunvc0bQ7dRmpEaTAd9bxtSc=; b=hatIS/d73EwrJkJtfrHjCO7rM686l05hRS4eawtMC8LgwQHVL5R21LGD+vZfrqg/4R 5h3409yUdmVrloAkw6Bx2dOV4V16TaT9s2t+g3lImJ3jkZXTMyIiSgXIU0WXCgY+xpg9 2gzWgQCJamk4HW4H081094/QvZVTXYpJRsAKpu3i1VGxR/dkMy2mFgdhKn6xfNpTL3y5 fr2KJ0WbVUl1CVQ51v4vtLp0z/bmd/mgNWffjur18Pi4fhUQolV31X+VeVuu96VsEupG vVql+n5Y4ltenOONhnYvfFRxbIORjJ6qWa4uhzDp9lh93lDnz/8mP/6DIzj/LXYdtNvr 21YA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousrzjlgjAtGgWcLzoJa5/EyQUDNTJLiTGubmkGVbmiNAf7JLZ57DlmpQechoBwx71xrem4i6iYe56SkVV9B
X-Received: by 10.107.50.19 with SMTP id y19mr40700132ioy.174.1471373128545; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.123.14 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 11:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <33052033-0992-ceb8-4390-6837017b140e@gmx.net>
References: <33052033-0992-ceb8-4390-6837017b140e@gmx.net>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:44:58 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCROB7vkKqXe9XAQcYjpsif5SqNcW0vxLPnLGX_rxBhbEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114469c4a8d5cd053a34c06b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/efxNCKXyHTQdA__qSrmsm_vEltA>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Token Binding for OAuth 2.0
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:45:31 -0000

Just a friendly reminder that the 'deadline' for this call for adoption is
tomorrow.

According to the minutes from Berlin
<https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/96/minutes/minutes-96-oauth>, 13 people
were in favor of adopting OAuth 2.0 Token Binding and 0 were against.

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net
> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> this is the call for adoption of the 'OAuth 2.0 Token Binding' document
> bundle* following the positive call for adoption at the recent IETF
> meeting in Berlin.
>
> Here are the links to the documents presented at the last IETF meeting:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-token-binding-00
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-tbpkce-00
>
> Please let us know by August 17th whether you accept / object to the
> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
> working group.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
> *: We will find out what the best document structure is later, i.e.,
> whether the content should be included in one, two or multiple documents.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email