Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus (Deadline: April 27)
Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com> Fri, 23 April 2010 21:31 UTC
Return-Path: <romeda@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F0A3A6A94 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tsi-cUQiJgP for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A913A69A2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so2534551pvg.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=5VVJFGKABjG5y0b7VjQmC28a7dRJyxiBHAMGXI8YdiM=; b=SNoHNDH+RRnThesCeR4VhjC9k78vxtc4Xbc6Dd0TO2FWcVXPbr+FwIfw7GxOR7aYbo hU2Vf2E3wUOvA7raJ3mCcyfl9guctICsEXshOvDdwirfU9NtArs/OJOWmQswjzaNm5BM M4eZCKBNoA9hkw3tsL2kNeXLJoux+VEfzFj2w=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=RIEU3wIssf9QzUJmmXBYwBdZMHxYPEBra212itCY+i7SJ7YSnUBlNTKP5gWvN46Zsn 9bmetVv2RJbRl6hrFEPmpDTBFFrd3ZOJWmB+RLfelFTMnbFR6G6c0pgIWLXl4jsi9gAP Wt4Gftav/qvPSrI8R0D7z9Ml7DErBlFPoSbK0=
Received: by 10.141.139.21 with SMTP id r21mr933012rvn.2.1272058268149; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.141.52.21 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Blaine Cook <romeda@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:30:48 +0100
Message-ID: <j2zd37b4b431004231430n1172a7fai59d7caa26bd48ca4@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus (Deadline: April 27)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:31:22 -0000
On 23 April 2010 17:01, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote: > On 4/23/10 8:05 AM, Prateek Mishra wrote: >> Do you mean April 29 (Thu) and April 30th (Fri)? > > Clearly yes. lol, neither. I think I managed to look at a 2009 calendar somehow, and travel has left me completely unaware as to the current date. To clarify: Hannes and I will promote Eran's draft to a working group document on Wednesday the *28th* barring any concerns. The deadline is Tuesday, the 27th. Sorry for any confusion! b.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus (Deadline: Apri… Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus (Deadline: Apri… Peter Saint-Andre