IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: WGLC on "JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access Tokens"

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 31 March 2020 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5E23A09F4 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bw7X8uIH2dF for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEF023A09F2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 02VMDKNl028865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:13:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:13:19 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Vittorio Bertocci <vittorio.bertocci=40auth0.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna=40amazon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'oauth' <oauth@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200331221319.GR50174@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <01ec01d6017c$162eb2e0$428c18a0$@aueb.gr> <CAHdPCmMzRn8iYG025Vq0sQNzgZTOkQJuMJwttDgjMDLESpjptw@mail.gmail.com> <CAO_FVe5UXY4Jxd3LdG6zyXJ8B8nFKYevcHQTVJEAFSdW0ku9tg@mail.gmail.com> <52f18114-4f8e-da86-5735-4c4e8f8d2db5@aol.com> <BL0PR08MB5394CA3CB524E95EA87CD6B6AEF10@BL0PR08MB5394.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <74da4cc3-359c-c08a-0ae5-54c8ca309f32@aol.com> <D080BE8B-BD0D-4F63-9F33-BA23C2FB42DD@amazon.com> <DM6PR08MB5402639817677AD59898CD65AECE0@DM6PR08MB5402.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <0F95AA25-C39B-4935-99D6-F7626F670097@amazon.com> <MWHPR19MB1501B135568630478941909AAEC80@MWHPR19MB1501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR19MB1501B135568630478941909AAEC80@MWHPR19MB1501.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/g2uzENG2JdpD0AFi9geIfOzu7lU>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: WGLC on "JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access Tokens"
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:13:27 -0000

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:33:35PM +0000, Vittorio Bertocci wrote:
> 
> > I’ve already replied to the other thread, but I’ll note that “different strengths, different lifecycles” don’t matter much if the RS will accept both types of tokens, signed with either key.
> point taken. I applied the changes discussed on the  other thread.
> 
> >As noted, I’d support making them REQUIRED. Failing that, RECOMMENDED.
> Promoted to RECOMMENDED

I'd also prefer REQUIRED, and thanks for already moving to RECOMMENDED
(which I was going to suggest as an alternative).

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email