[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7631)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 05 September 2023 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5D7C14CEFA for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 06:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL=0.732, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BOvTVPDlD-JS for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (unknown [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C62C151061 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 79674B3AF4; Tue, 5 Sep 2023 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: daiusa3@icloud.com, dick.hardt@gmail.com, oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20230905125958.79674B3AF4@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 05:59:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/hfv4jDFdmUk9IrnBvldV-yfuH7k>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7631)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:00:02 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7631 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Daiki Usami <daiusa3@icloud.com> Section: 3.2.1 Original Text ------------- This protects the client from substitution of the authentication code. Corrected Text -------------- This protects the client from substitution of the authorization code. Notes ----- It will be a bit confusing to figure out if it is a MAC or an authorization code. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31) -------------------------------------- Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC674… Aaron Parecki