Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension

Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com> Fri, 28 January 2011 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mscurtescu@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3503A68E3 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:04:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.157, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25JoE4g-hC9c for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [216.239.44.51]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C183A681A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:04:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.65]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p0SI7TXC027877 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:07:29 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1296238049; bh=ckmwEdeYnsUVvJ9xXRjFIbUnrLw=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=wSCn1govVepOV1gj1CSpdEbmSA8CE1NqWVIo3oo+I/rgG+agsQ0j5TbijNFs6LPsL e1NXLYRe5xaE5jeahhrag==
Received: from ywf7 (ywf7.prod.google.com [10.192.6.7]) by wpaz1.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p0SI7Rci030251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:07:28 -0800
Received: by ywf7 with SMTP id 7so1804813ywf.22 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:07:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=IqwjfzkCJQk2/U/xZDrwwhu8cZ0DGN7V1iaGK2VpVps=; b=xpm2kqjGob1fpGfLmdo0mJQBhunyH2OKVguYm9S6agsoNFuwxeT33crUmUkQod16NZ pAhrf8up6I+bUGfGAmrA==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=CYe6EKP8sM1fySEdUAyR89yxrc+nPCYHmlCetaw5I8B32EXURmt6ytgY5Zktt3TvN2 fCgNKp9k7BIoJEXRqr4g==
Received: by 10.100.96.13 with SMTP id t13mr1794410anb.112.1296238047324; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:07:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.153.9 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:07:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723445A8FB28DE@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <AANLkTi=YWLHV1Yi0bdKTaDaBw3X5D6Y_kk3xt7EvJHe_@mail.gmail.com> <4D239DCF.4030501@lodderstedt.net> <AANLkTi=RAS5X0jUjxFzf6k1_r+79NFSFjmZs2bw2Lg3o@mail.gmail.com> <3C83928E-56D5-4386-A075-9ECF1F3A469C@kiva.org> <AANLkTin_=nJi7yeJ8VTMV-dufB8UoP5Y4r1ffM+82vgO@mail.gmail.com> <4E163351-08AE-47FA-B1F2-ECE6535346C1@kiva.org> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723445A8FB28DE@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
From: Marius Scurtescu <mscurtescu@google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:07:07 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinyjwfyEgtT83eDELZ2-To7uwLgqavgOk=Xr2BY@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:04:23 -0000

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:
> Why not:
>
> urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
>
> Can you can add more flavors for different ways of floating the token/code up to the application. This requires no changes at all to -12 to allow this special case.

Using the simpler "oob" does require changes to the core spec? Why?

Marius