Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09
Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Wed, 30 June 2010 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26FA53A6848 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.573, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zxi5N0Mh+1fh for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.18]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E406E3A659A for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 13546 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2010 15:40:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.19) by p3plex1out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 30 Jun 2010 15:40:55 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.20]) by P3PW5EX1HT001.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.19]) with mapi; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:40:54 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: "OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:41:01 -0700
Thread-Topic: Draft -09
Thread-Index: AcsXVmRrsO6Hfs/LQgKeY82EBJQ0KwAA86rwAEPvUvA=
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C088@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4BCCC@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4BCCE@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4BCCE@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343B3ED4C088P3PW5EX1MB01E_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:40:54 -0000
The SharedCopy experiment is working great (at least for me). However, they have a bug where the sticky notes move so please always highlight the text in addition to leaving a note. EHL From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran Hammer-Lahav Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:11 AM To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 For editorial feedback, I am going to try something new and use SharedCopy.com (no install required). Try it out at: http://r6.sharedcopy.com/6bnqq8v If this doesn't work, I'll let people know and cancel it. EHL From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran Hammer-Lahav Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:56 PM To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Draft -09 is now posted. Main changes include: o Fixed typos, editorial changes. Thanks to Dick for his useful feedback. o Added token expiration example. o Added scope parameter to end-user authorization endpoint response and WWW-Authenticate header. o Added note about parameters with empty values (same as omitted). o Changed parameter values to use '-' instead of '_'. Parameter names still use '_'. o Changed authorization endpoint client type to response type with values: code, token, or both. o Complete cleanup of error codes. Added support for error description and URI. o Add initial extensibility support. Draft -09 represents what I consider to be the first feature complete proposal. While it still needs much work, it has notes for open issues and missing parts. I plan to give people 2 weeks to review and provide extensive feedback, and will post one more draft before the 7/12 cutoff date for the meeting. My goal is to collect enough feedback to declare the next draft (-10) stable for wider implementation. If you were waiting for a stable draft to study and provide extensive feedback, this is the draft! When giving feedback pretend this is your last chance to making a significant contribution or changes to the core specification. Please submit feedback by 7/9. When submitting feedback please start a new thread for each item. Editorial commentary can be collected in one post (and please send to the list, even if it is minor, because I tend to get the same typo correction many times). Thanks, EHL
- [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Pelle Braendgaard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Draft -09 Eran Hammer-Lahav