Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0
Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Wed, 06 April 2016 19:52 UTC
Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 174FE12D7A0 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:52:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pingidentity.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdPNMAjjmErg for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com (mail-io0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3556B12D782 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 2so69231097ioy.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pingidentity.com; s=gmail; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IeMudqKOCpll56XRcVak3B53Q+740KEqnETR0MXRDjU=; b=o+AbLT5VR6dTcTqUPK4ER1mfeyGj9R1mmrAsaUnJ9v6JuYu3TmXmn7EF22kQy0w0u5 OdGZgp4FoirMb4KiuWriCtD5BaQokNKxXT1wacm9z5Rjlobi3IhIXHBHfVxvdVwvzIkh D6eCoxjyQ9aov8+TfkVGCCQ7+E3LiyCrnBz98=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IeMudqKOCpll56XRcVak3B53Q+740KEqnETR0MXRDjU=; b=IXEohkDDGpd+UpMWCa6N2hmwJvwQg3QvvBR/AtSz45X4gS7OZfLphKR0JRAQ5hiWLx DCxNquDH5/JOdIlc4Ie8tsFVCqc8Bl/R3I+CLcig1MuzUzoDFz3a/Gx4UlTIVsKa+mRl /YkLGT7H0IOYStoyVmk0Qns+N4Svk/z0VrDC7D7mSfRl+6x/gle0eYbpkforVZG38KJO BFRsZo283voxtHVyEkAcJotssLKZZZh+yGsojLnpQ/MkB1JTw+5HNKkHCX1VETJZPZMg FoHdaz2eIc95PROlMJMYa8FVWcEEqC8SIVnrjVPBIE2Bl6m37lm7SnzomMs9ipdyvToE 3cwg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLXY6GsxSkBTJ6Av3LFmzk2GvSua3iGAfUznc0Mj86y1qJnxswmNZAljCSPdr3vmbVVBdAad+fMqix289Jx
X-Received: by 10.107.13.133 with SMTP id 127mr28177715ion.129.1459972348477; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.74.162 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5AD9C0D6-C3BA-421D-99F6-B98FA509ADC6@oracle.com>
References: <570546A1.8040509@gmx.net> <B69A5BC1-C0DE-416F-8147-FC780C539CB9@oracle.com> <57055D2D.9000600@gmx.net> <5AD9C0D6-C3BA-421D-99F6-B98FA509ADC6@oracle.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:51:59 -0300
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCSyB5KT8_f511oSBJSYS3rNAziR51DfA1bPSJhoNTK6Zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Phil Hunt (IDM)" <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113ffc70369596052fd64dfa"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/ozbeKYkd0_8LHtR-VWfZ4qjeGYc>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:52:31 -0000
I support the adoption of this draft by the working group. I don't think an immediate WGLC was expected here. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.hunt@oracle.com> wrote: > With the process of immediate wglc I think we should review all documents > more thoroughly before adoption. > > As I said I support the work. > > Phil > > > On Apr 6, 2016, at 16:02, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> > wrote: > > > > Phil, > > > > we have discussed this concept already for years. In fact, it dates back > > to the days of the OAuth base specification and the security > > consideration section even talks about it. > > > > We have had the content of this in the PoP key distribution draft and we > > are now moving it into a separate document. > > > > I am not sure how much longer you want to discuss it. > > > > Ciao > > Hannes > > > > > >> On 04/06/2016 08:07 PM, Phil Hunt (IDM) wrote: > >> I would like to have more discussion before wg adoption. > >> > >> I support the work and am willing to help. > >> > >> Phil > >> > >>> On Apr 6, 2016, at 14:25, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> this is the call for adoption of 'Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0', > see > >>> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-campbell-oauth-resource-indicators/ > >>> > >>> Please let us know by April 20th whether you accept / object to the > >>> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth > >>> working group. > >>> > >>> Note: If you already stated your opinion at the IETF meeting in Buenos > >>> Aires then you don't need to re-state your opinion, if you want. > >>> > >>> The feedback at the BA IETF meeting was the following: ~10 persons > >>> for accepting the document and 0 persons against. > >>> > >>> Ciao > >>> Hannes & Derek > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OAuth mailing list > >>> OAuth@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
- [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indicators… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… William Denniss
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Phil Hunt (IDM)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Phil Hunt (IDM)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Prateek Mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Hardt, Dick
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Sergey Beryozkin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… William Denniss
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Resource Indica… Nat Sakimura