[OAUTH-WG] JAR: JWT typ
Dominick Baier <dbaier@leastprivilege.com> Tue, 19 May 2020 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <dbaier@leastprivilege.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249563A1369 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=leastprivilege-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hxMNaL0SErfq for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 447973A1368 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id s1so14248730qkf.9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=leastprivilege-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Sn81VJQPkcAev5iSi9dg86Hlc3xbp0rgAHcflCV6DXw=; b=vJr9mOB8W6lzpVn45/xwWLu9Gkdq6+wgJTW/94I7HEf3qoxIozKmSJdjgYsKmDDUny eyq1hIWitv9kJjy+3OQRUJZQhD6xG5ZZhJ4D25mozfIv2AcM94MPm7iuz3zz0s2b849b vv+uR5f9hI40KRgDfdUaf+kxw3GPtpmRGesbO5p0uZds8Lbvs5wsqWQlqPwkJS81VXFj GvtRjyvmLCkczIyRq3PjaYOGTXlxf7U7mL2J/2ij9spU7aZDdbC/BF883OEGC4OP3f2G 7jRVHWjLrdF4eZCE6cBXKyAtj6p0ah/Qami+TXqWCHm1Npu+IfNpdtwCWE3cdB4qfVJ0 oDGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Sn81VJQPkcAev5iSi9dg86Hlc3xbp0rgAHcflCV6DXw=; b=KK8AsubfQjgcQ4zFYNAR3uE6U8mc6dolwpqg6ggEPKqbSKXIwHalI/G97iRLopwmK5 WTy7waKzlfFX5aWa2jX/oiYf79SvyT0XxbWk7NnMI6rNCOhKvRfwhLsGysC+UFedU1O7 XbOdlp3RopVZ7g3ypkCHf919cHj35WhHgQW6BJKCZ+bii2B9uItu7oncPBDWQBN9vZdP bnKH53lyeE2CPBGh3M+yvpihAg5DiUljCh4Q56BNUX4OhMdDO8uQmJSVDi9F+ZcYWa+g nBhxzkjQKEXE5o9zt2B/PnwgjQvSiyUe8Vjb5hPxHWsMBM6cZJwFxHME6fAk42ytbAE4 x9Bw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308TI2jX+VorSCusrgZDSXxeAZLxg0FwUgwivc4sN1sgnu8a5or c5ZrMwoQt1VULMdw4bideE0rThLLlOFXB1ReQ28mldGDbQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkRuDgQDdvorcTe5Vyv9CSeyTpXkMMCTRUOqleEQmqAOwHDt9d/6QiFq/Ye7NuEDNHTv/ZAE2WHHPFK+npi0U=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:484c:: with SMTP id v73mr19764029qka.496.1589884824916; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:24 -0700
From: Dominick Baier <dbaier@leastprivilege.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 03:40:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO7Ng+sQijSHAExxhmA6uskEEnogFBHtsDuta8d482-5C+JNwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003928bf05a5fde8af"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/pKL_l_ArO_sSAo0w3qThtvlDuDc>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] JAR: JWT typ
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:40:28 -0000
Hi, This has been brought up before - but no response. Either I can’t find it - or it is missing. But is the setting the JWT typ explicitly mentioned somewhere? I think it should to prevent cross JWT confusion. Thanks ——— Dominick Baier
- [OAUTH-WG] JAR: JWT typ Dominick Baier