IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call: JSON Web Token Best Current Practices

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 17 April 2018 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C57127698 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1wUj5Z0882a for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DA612D779 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w3HAOdY8021046; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:24:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from client-0025.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0025.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40QLw73gTlzDWWl; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:24:39 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0801MB21126C75C51AFC361852988BFAB00@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:24:38 +0200
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 545653476.779152-52f533609212caac21e829c30ec9c5cb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2A008301-0BB6-4DAB-98AF-0728FEE5F205@tzi.org>
References: <VI1PR0801MB21126C75C51AFC361852988BFAB00@VI1PR0801MB2112.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/qP5UC-nZQo6DBMEcD9Us1eV5Pyc>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Working Group Last Call: JSON Web Token Best Current Practices
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 10:24:51 -0000

I haven’t read the document yet, but idnits did some reading for me:

  ** The document seems to lack a Security Considerations section.

  ** The abstract seems to contain references ([RFC7519]), which it
     shouldn't.  Please replace those with straight textual mentions of the
     documents in question.

  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 7159 (Obsoleted by RFC 8259)

I’ll get to the content later…

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email