Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth
Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org> Tue, 17 April 2012 13:31 UTC
Return-Path: <jricher@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD0521F861C for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4F+2LHv8Tpku for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (smtpksrv1.mitre.org [198.49.146.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1929221F8613 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 06:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpksrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id A088421B0FE4; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:31:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from IMCCAS03.MITRE.ORG (imccas03.mitre.org [129.83.29.80]) by smtpksrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A4021B0FE1; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:31:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [129.83.50.12] (129.83.31.51) by IMCCAS03.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:31:07 -0400
Message-ID: <4F8D7076.3040203@mitre.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:30:30 -0400
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
References: <1537B0C1-9B8B-4D37-8D25-D863C823697D@gmx.net> <1886AC50-18EF-4511-99F2-6DC44F415759@oracle.com> <CE8995AB5D178F44A2154F5C9A97CAF4024FFE144A6D@HE111541.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394366487923@TK5EX14MBXC284.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <34E26D40-340F-48A9-9761-D0B2B558DB6A@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <34E26D40-340F-48A9-9761-D0B2B558DB6A@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [129.83.31.51]
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:31:17 -0000
It was also my understanding that this was for something outside of IIW, in addition to whatever happens *at* IIW. Nothing's stopping there being various IIW sessions on topic as well, but there's something to be said for getting together for a few hours at a shot without the distractions of the rest of the unconference going on simultaneously. It's worked well before. -- Justin On 04/16/2012 06:28 PM, John Bradley wrote: > I only purchased the Tuesday for IIW because I am tied up Wednesday and Thursday is traditionally digital death or something like that. > > Tuesday is best if it is going to be during IIW hours. Though I thought Hannes was suggesting something outside IIW. > > John B. > On 2012-04-17, at 12:21 AM, Mike Jones wrote: > >> I propose that you schedule this session at IIW on Thursday, as that looks like the time that will garner the greatest participation. >> >> -- Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Axel.Nennker@telekom.de >> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 10:55 AM >> To: phil.hunt@oracle.com; hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net >> Cc: oauth@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth >> >> Same for me. Tues-Thurs works better for me too. >> Axel >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil Hunt >> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:15 PM >> To: Hannes Tschofenig >> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth >> >> Can do, but would prefer a date Tues-Thurs as am flying home Thurs eve. >> >> Phil >> >> @independentid >> www.independentid.com >> phil.hunt@oracle.com >> >> >> >> >> >> On 2012-04-16, at 4:55 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I was wondering how many of you will be at the upcoming IIW in Mountain View (or for some other event). IIW will run from Tuesday (May 1st) to Thursday (May 3rd). >>> >>> I thought it might be good to useful to get together on the Friday after the IIW event for a OAuth breakfast chat. >>> I am sure that there are still a couple of topics that require brainstorming. >>> >>> Drop me a message if you are able and interested. >>> >>> Ciao >>> Hannes >>> >>> PS: Please do not forget to read the Assertion specs so that we can get them out of the door. >>> (And thanks to those who have already read them.) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OAuth mailing list >>> OAuth@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Axel.Nennker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Allan Foster
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Simon Josefsson
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] IIW and OAuth Justin Richer