IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec

Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Fri, 11 May 2012 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E051F21F8554 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vG7DqjwpXso3 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.131.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652C621F847C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P3PWEX2HT003.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.11]) by p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 8XJw1j0050EuLVk01XJwjr; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:18:56 -0700
Received: from P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net ([169.254.8.88]) by P3PWEX2HT003.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.11]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:18:56 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
Thread-Index: AQHNL0PAhuowGSXnN0+Nexv4rL5LgpbELbCQ
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 07:18:56 +0000
Message-ID: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201029A8A@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <7D98C51F-84D8-48AA-B94D-EABE4D0921DB@gmx.net> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201026B48@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B1680429673943664CE3AE@TK5EX14MBXC283.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201026CA8@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20120510235528.0a735658@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120510235528.0a735658@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.74.213.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer Spec
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 07:18:58 -0000

Don't know. In the 5 RFCs I've worked on, I - as editor - was the only personal who interacted with the IESG. Either way, it is usually the editor who is addressing questions about the text and proposing changes.

EH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SM [mailto:sm@resistor.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:00 AM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Encoding of Errors in the Base and in the Bearer
> Spec
> 
> Hi Eran,
> At 16:04 09-05-2012, Eran Hammer wrote:
> >The IESG members rely on the editor to represent the WG decisions to
> >them when addressing issues. You failed to do that, promoted your
> >personal view, and now we are having this discussion all over again
> >- a discussion that last time was only resolved by creating the design
> >committee.
> 
> Isn't it up the Document Shepherd to coordinate the resolution of DISCUSS
> or COMMENT items?
> 
> Regards,
> -sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email