Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed OAuth Extensions

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Tue, 14 June 2011 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCC911E8294 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Xlh+H19F9jm for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B699711E8292 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so4537832gxk.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q10hSb66x6KAWdCPwDx9mj4tPPL7KJiWfybBHkz9ZAw=; b=RhSQdxGerOMwvQmSngr9o9soVjtO02HA3PxsWy1yar5mmkZWtGVl5rGZtKWK+Jm9Dt gdMgNkFMCCN3Io7+iZ47OAQu8gxqJ/fJgCeKZr52GP3VQWHx+9ZKsPQF68DT5USmRpBE uaC/xBUPtVSKUk/+D0AqKOS/0EcK1mZy8KdZo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=fP9ZnfyYXFBbCTmrLZLnn1LF7Z5tzW6ckka/ZAf69G95MZ0yr1iFenhkQOAg6tJ2x6 ye+MMgC8izKJ5MIrLdOdKW9yfnv6/qOWpv9H2SK5lXYe5Av2reLlpg/5efpM14YnTFRn pS6abAhxBJUFmBABkQsbv3kQdztnMquJVca9Y=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.168.99 with SMTP id j63mr6065439yhl.117.1308028848918; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.147.113.3 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DF6EC1F.4020703@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <DDDF3DB6-03F5-464B-92F1-14F059C97A6D@mac.com> <4DF3198C.8080901@lodderstedt.net> <BANLkTinzzPA1ue9MdxpZDxvWqGXSgMQ4Vg@mail.gmail.com> <4DF6EC1F.4020703@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 01:20:48 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9VvsTLLMmX6YRy6RLEnYb98lsYk
Message-ID: <BANLkTinintqUcUH4mq6Gb8tHQq_xRxvAZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposed OAuth Extensions
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:20:50 -0000

> I think there has been a confusion.  I also thought that the rechartering
> was to be discussed at the July meeting; the IETF call for rechartering was
> issued on May 31.

Right, and that call was not for discussion of rechartering, but for a
review of the specific proposed charter.

The charter that we discussed here was sent out for internal review on
31 May, and was approved by the IESG last Thursday -- that should be
officially announced any time now.  That charter, if you recall, was
very focused and included milestones for submitting OAuth 2.0, bearer
tokens, and MAC auth to the IESG in July and August, and discussion of
rechartering again, for further work, in October.

We won't be discussing rechartering in Québec, unless we've finished
those three documents already.  That seems unlikely.  But if we can do
it, tant mieux.

Barry