Re: [OAUTH-WG] A draft on CBOR Web Tokens (CWT)

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Thu, 12 November 2015 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BE01B355D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:38:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_zcWq4UziET for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:38:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0118.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4071B355C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:38:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=jZyGgdsipmPKVxDiPM1KtO8db1ti0ExlwdNYo+v3rmc=; b=f309s7G9O/zIiTkULSin7FXJwTIUFx2DzxjjagGQdGZByZi5Kr/rkZcI+7WSaRK5pQJEWlierttyY2nho/29gnzAMEIDgBdzN51MatZEDeBOHA1hs0cp2pM8Lt4fpvjIgIT7bTFbi6v6rcQ+3aGnoVPaKCtEEueS+GZAV7v6aus=
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.145) by BY2PR03MB443.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.141.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.325.17; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:38:29 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) by BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.141.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0325.003; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:38:29 +0000
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: Erik Wahlström neXus <erik.wahlstrom@nexusgroup.com>, "<oauth@ietf.org>" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: A draft on CBOR Web Tokens (CWT)
Thread-Index: AQHRHX3DyXQEi0Hb60mPSXqbnVxSe56Y2MzQ
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:38:29 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR03MB442CD32A3E442C53707A09FF5120@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <53BB1987-979C-4945-9C7D-CDB6619AEFFC@nexusgroup.com> <EEA8113B-E287-4B25-9301-0B50BCD22D7B@nexusgroup.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEA8113B-E287-4B25-9301-0B50BCD22D7B@nexusgroup.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Michael.Jones@microsoft.com;
x-originating-ip: [50.47.89.201]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR03MB443; 5:9o83mr9bJaqzsNVigBDD6N6hXOVmpT814RCX0S3haHxBZKkN4RmqDNye9gR+NDjVwMCuZreg/kvA6cgL2ok4DMPk1b7RKiXjtvUQ/25Qn739lN64v0MZw3fBMCNJCq25NiKexm0FnWMoHfPk5lABCg==; 24:lcsCt1uIKl+dU9uov81SKIkVlA52/6CQ+0PYoX2RZHCQSG3+UPNZqjbi9JMklV/FRoDLXZu6vuWc2wD2omwpYlh6jBlQgV8Ya1wsS+f4sqk=; 20:FsY3Fj5lVmI2z0XT5JzCnn4wfxEoFq/W93D+hPHuv7BgbM32aAARBNCbtL00ymdRUWKEvORzOIBcfyrj3gPSpQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR03MB443;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR03MB4437811EDF626777B0E9272F5120@BY2PR03MB443.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(108003899814671);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425024)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(61426024)(61427024); SRVR:BY2PR03MB443; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR03MB443;
x-forefront-prvs: 07584EDBCD
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(209900001)(377454003)(199003)(13464003)(189002)(69234005)(50986999)(54356999)(19300405004)(107886002)(10090500001)(16236675004)(19580395003)(33656002)(19580405001)(15975445007)(101416001)(76176999)(561944003)(19625215002)(2950100001)(106356001)(77096005)(2900100001)(105586002)(8990500004)(10290500002)(10400500002)(92566002)(99286002)(5005710100001)(106116001)(102836002)(87936001)(5008740100001)(11100500001)(5002640100001)(122556002)(5001920100001)(5001770100001)(5003600100002)(5004730100002)(66066001)(76576001)(189998001)(5001960100002)(81156007)(97736004)(5007970100001)(74316001)(86362001)(86612001)(19617315012)(40100003)(491001)(6606295002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB443; H:BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR03MB442CD32A3E442C53707A09FF5120BY2PR03MB442namprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Nov 2015 20:38:29.4314 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR03MB443
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/rH5QNmEFFDevVPm1wHX5dIqatis>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] A draft on CBOR Web Tokens (CWT)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:38:38 -0000

FYI - I also wrote about this at http://self-issued.info/?p=1476 and as @selfissued<https://twitter.com/selfissued>.



-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Erik Wahlström neXus
Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 11:26 AM
To: <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] A draft on CBOR Web Tokens (CWT)



Hi,



In the ACE WG a straw man proposal of a CBOR Web Token (CWT) was defined in the draft "Authorization for the Internet of Things using OAuth 2.0” [1]. We just broke out the CBOR Web Token into a separate draft and the new draft is submitted to the OAUTH WG. It can be found here:



https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wahlstroem-oauth-cbor-web-token/



Abstract:

"CBOR Web Token (CWT) is a compact means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties.  CWT is a profile of the JSON Web Token (JWT) that is optimized for constrained devices. The claims in a CWT are encoded in the Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) and CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) is used for added application layer security protection.  A claim is a piece of information asserted about a subject and is represented as a name/value pair consisting of a claim name and a claim value."



/ Erik





[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seitz-ace-oauth-authz-00



_______________________________________________

OAuth mailing list

OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth