IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Status summary of document in AD Evaluation status

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Tue, 26 January 2021 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C6A3A0A65 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:20:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6N77R9oThzPl for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B393A0A63 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 15:20:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10QNKqvm044494 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:20:52 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu 10QNKqvm044494
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1611703252; bh=kmXcBIaIlacw+u4SLmND9e1poNoHdslBKQ2axX+Ljpk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qv+SNhSQ0XoOEoClKi4hD+PH0nGAxyrZG+bVqND7EeqwOPoIqEcxN8yDtB0Dmhxng esJEjRw37hA2lh4E+pu9iyn5KYt4Xht+glW4Q8lII4UanRtajAieS1388YUWy1O/6d fgEdYbCHWjhy4R41IAnBN9cvTMBiRYWEiZqhrRVA=
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (morris.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.46]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 10QNKnep005135 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:20:49 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:20:49 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.002; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:20:49 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Status summary of document in AD Evaluation status
Thread-Index: AdbubEWrYMo70AXPSgiZWGEVZkUzVAFzN0IA
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 23:20:48 +0000
Message-ID: <b7b2c44d33ad4707b9f7756399d1b866@cert.org>
References: <e348eecb3b3b41cda26fca5b21603dbf@cert.org>
In-Reply-To: <e348eecb3b3b41cda26fca5b21603dbf@cert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.203.54]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/rihOqzF6IJjjbPeYLST4geSGack>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Status summary of document in AD Evaluation status
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 23:20:56 -0000

Hi!

A correction ...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Danyliw
> Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 9:11 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Status summary of document in AD Evaluation status
> 
> Hi!
> 
> Below is a summary explanation of where all of the documents that are with
> me (as AD) stand.  I hope this better explains the status in the datatracker.
> 
> ==[ draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt
> Status: AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed (aka, after WG LC but before IETF LC
> pending edits the AD has requested)
> 
> Pending edits from AD review confirmed at
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/t57XP7RICTpoI3FbOyrY0gpsNnE/.
> After these are merged, this document can proceed to IESG Review.

These edits have been merged and the document is now in IETC LC.

> ==[ draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq
> Status: Status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead:Revised I-D Needed (aka, after the
> second WG and IETF LC, but IETF LC Directorate reviews require action)
> 
> All AD review and individual IETF LC feedback was addressed.
> 
> A few outstanding updates remain from the IETF LC SECDIR review --
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/5CrZTLR8v6cm8wZVkfY_Yywckcw/
> .
> 
> After these changes are made, this document can return for IESG Review.
> 
> ==[ draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response
> Status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead:Revised I-D Needed (aka, after the second WG
> and IETF LC, but IESG DISCUSS position from first IESG requires actions)

[snip]

I made a mistake when reviewing the old ballot position against the document -- I must have used an older version.  This document was ready and has been placed on the Feb 6, 2021 telechat.    Thanks to Torsten for double checking.

Roman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email