[OAUTH-WG] Weekly github digest (OAuth Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 07 April 2024 07:46 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3B2C14F696 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 00:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="fBwnwFBD"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="m3J9IJ0T"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sKk8o30Cp6do for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 00:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.144]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4FAAC14F6A2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 00:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D9513800FA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 03:39:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 07 Apr 2024 03:39:26 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1712475566; x=1712561966; bh=Ib1nM84CBbCBpqFbbqbcF1OpjUIsLYTKILs sgUocxmY=; b=fBwnwFBDdQ2fQD7n4B/4Fu5UGPSSMMEmqOWI3k0aDCcbtj9qYRx gtUh9SQD4Skp/O0bsiZSkfz0w7YMyIIJooEd9k+VqoAhW9EselJK78jiDB5HrmDF I1UpGbbkfgvyZrlYFU48qraz8VdhE7xe5ZMXNs7oHvD7ELsDMXYfPjeSnBMcuPH9 JNDBWpj78eeEhDe+9HuVnDFYNiSjoSfJClNttSkHkgQ7FfGPKXNpA3rs9KaSNifR sfrQ9KpliGeRVLKM5kTAOZvlYaUF+RfRkCnfmXfEYQqakizzZUGvz3oPT/yBe1cA 6TTt/lmffbTLbEOV4y6lLPy0bccMPiraHfw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1712475566; x= 1712561966; bh=Ib1nM84CBbCBpqFbbqbcF1OpjUIsLYTKILssgUocxmY=; b=m 3J9IJ0TLjaZ3fuqK0hcgGajKZBu5G4FS2SZllJAO3Ctg3BFjexnnMjC/2wk/oQpp 8spZQRiOHUMq6R3krpGf1OyQkQv1I0U3dguXMMEXEa8ltBy4wMhOXLRiKF/l0yHr SzKEQCEusk04nkmH0YvoL1S+84tPCZzg5Y9xB3xy5mHlEaVKE0m7T2sS4c+GPCqv 9xHq4IIgbblA9nHydat5pucdLInry/vH02tEJixShrqm5BXPFCJZXC44AzfUIsLU bLQ/mkUk7PLk/FC7mapyt/ZedlrwJShpwK2dpdSpjPTIA0Tgcp5gCSEFNJj7rskr RaIw6oGs/9DV9ECmh47hA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:rk0SZljNzCtPjd-vRQcF4V0ybKjrJTnPAoGtjG0mltyHZqn3VZzfCQ> <xme:rk0SZqCaxotJvH4Bh8NIbN0CKVd4zw8z-HozsPomvuc-1yAK-n1V1DSWokdOFCKjj tHaDfP0TSG6bTXuKA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:rk0SZlHuWzV9ap_HViyG6ELyYPb18kJPIltblH7a00DjAWaRuGVSuqSVDw9nKrjlDrKWIZMX0qVCgkoEA9LoUXO3pjGAR9L9RgGO7eWgAGmVTn5TgxrdTPySbx-vtx2dknAJ9A>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrudegfedguddvudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:rk0SZqSq0IWUlDay49O3JhG83nJhQoIXaPWSVgWT5yUaFO6kQfsHLg> <xmx:rk0SZizEmzbe02g38nu6j8beHUBYoDwdKew6zQqHj2MToeuaST6t2Q> <xmx:rk0SZg6rCLTGXs_NtO5gWqhESfs8CktndFa0PuT1tTwtHkay0cHEJw> <xmx:rk0SZnz65LgCx3S-tSojzyhV7RnJBtG6wRTrTYR23zeyJYTHEE_fYQ> <xmx:rk0SZm8kCuh1anRld0ZYvRMgaChvoU3Fqpihb6WjzDFv47xbZ52TtdNE>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 03:39:26 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1785171358826065743=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240407074621.D4FAAC14F6A2@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 00:46:21 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/uKvO1K1J7sEEA3xZ9mqwleBkGhg>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Weekly github digest (OAuth Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 07:46:26 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens (+0/-0/š¬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #84 Possible confusion in IANA registry section (1 by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens/issues/84
* oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc (+3/-2/š¬5)
3 issues created:
- Consider recommending a way to encode other data types. (by danielfett)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/225
- claims and display etc in type metadata (by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/224
- I18N for Metadata (by awoie)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/223
4 issues received 5 new comments:
- #225 Consider recommending a way to encode other data types. (1 by babisRoutis)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/225
- #224 claims and display etc in type metadata (2 by bc-pi, danielfett)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/224 [metadata]
- #223 I18N for Metadata (1 by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/223
- #221 Integrity of Type Metadata (1 by c2bo)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/221
2 issues closed:
- Is the following a valid SD-JWT-VC or how can it be mapped to the SD-JWT-VC? https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/121 [question] [pending close]
- Provide W3C VCDM transformation algorithm https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/issues/114 [pending close]
* oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (+0/-2/š¬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #416 Add Test suite for SD-JWT (1 by bc-pi)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/issues/416
2 issues closed:
- state what salt does https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/issues/417
- Explicit clarification over correct formatting of objects with no disclosed elements https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/issues/418
Pull requests
-------------
* oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc (+0/-0/š¬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #220 feat: add SD-JWT VC Type Metadata (1 by awoie)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/pull/220
* oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata (+0/-1/š¬0)
1 pull requests merged:
- Apply Atul's WGLC feedback
https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata/pull/23
* oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (+0/-2/š¬2)
1 pull requests received 2 new comments:
- #394 Distinguish SD-JWT from SD-JWT+KB (2 by bc-pi, selfissued)
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/394
2 pull requests merged:
- better explain what salt does
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/421
- Add specificity around handling of disclosure resulting in an empty object
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/420
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-browser-based-apps
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-identity-chaining
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-transaction-tokens
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-sd-jwt-vc
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/draft-ietf-oauth-resource-metadata
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-cross-device-security
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt
* https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1
- [OAUTH-WG] Weekly github digest (OAuth Activity Sā¦ Repository Activity Summary Bot