Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7009 (6663)

Ash Narayanan <ashvinnarayanan@gmail.com> Wed, 01 September 2021 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ashvinnarayanan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399B03A1D26 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iy2296wLyTos for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C45663A1D2B for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 16:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id u25so239016oiv.5 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h9ymqRoki4LlAF2z/b30i0UqPn0i52V0p+kAxfCsXNs=; b=EVld8/8OkjDOFrqJK7bYIwadXYQmETbWggFKZctQk9mnOt0/Rb+hqByqiecgXgMfAr mWMZKcQ/89MSFgWaWgQD6VAPtnoMPAkdlyoBuJoJ9AcNLC1V+LqjtsnTatOV8xNQcLZN zS2/8luHgh6298zB5b3GawQN/Lz8Q0n8vKVrsC0XiynUSqXWrQWN+klP9QPk/C4JFs0H cwwAeJ9cOVMryQb1O1M/M30S6Os+pB7ZGRV13UQpP6ZtatogTJpfTRXD/QPZWjKzEVdU aVCVZtIChJnlyBQjoDajTOMqgCnUkQlooU7z3i5Ajqxgh3aoOLZ910EtzqRebl4OeWHH DFbg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h9ymqRoki4LlAF2z/b30i0UqPn0i52V0p+kAxfCsXNs=; b=aYxHDgRy1KC7DQAz7nsRsupHjHNCO9nBHvI6OCsCqiomjqgnsDeWT6vIIp8jK5c1Y6 +1QX18S6FnSbNfRS3NHc2FnSfQ6y5AmhqkNXTMSpbeHqDnV5okyfYEaZtLflXOSssDqb wrOCWcCJLn4aGKhV4cPtIFUykI7bmDoCLcS/182Q9iXmB4ey3dggh9LmE9YQcGxNyWVQ mZhrOHquQG1KystNPRYfLG628r6RUqj6PHK2vLYASWKmAVsuTNs3p4lqXJwYi63O1QU1 g9A4ofcHVaQDRtFhOavUQfrLxlM9xiMtCNRGR750dcCoMgDqG6bAe9PjJhavoNKzB3nv Gulg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322LnFWkyoiRVIGbsRvS2X+BscAutDYefdDC9lpyFqZaDVunZcv 2xc9kpUUMyyqicEht+ylRBAkHOVqUNsFWJDNFgA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyilRRALRhXxKLDFvSLr8+9ncAcfDgq0naPjS+aN7qZSVQIvwJoZbVlITd/TGyc5SxNu32GYWSJ4L6x4rqbC/8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3193:: with SMTP id x141mr131438oix.110.1630537749000; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210822091434.93EFCF40723@rfc-editor.org> <80CE09CD-E462-4CB6-B4CC-EF4A7BE9F854@mit.edu> <CAEayHEP1Jg-WPo-4B5k5JVA_zDOL7m1tWq9q2yWSS_deRcP6Fw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEayHEP1Jg-WPo-4B5k5JVA_zDOL7m1tWq9q2yWSS_deRcP6Fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ash Narayanan <ashvinnarayanan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 09:08:57 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFvbn=Zsh87pxNr_uXiOBOQ__ZJrqGPrkyOJbY5h1WLGzkemqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>, mscurtescu@google.com, sdronia@gmx.de
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000052773405caf727d6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/v4HN9711zja7txwKxSdZP4FU21Y>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7009 (6663)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:09:33 -0000

Hi Thomas,

The approach you've suggested sounds good. Passing just the client_id along
with the token and type (regardless of client type) would be consistent
with how refresh_token requests are structured. As long as the new RFC
obsoletes this one.

Ash