IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error extensibility proposal

Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> Fri, 01 April 2011 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAFF3A6B65 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id saqvcL3MEHP0 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [72.167.180.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 11A6A3A6B80 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9192 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2011 01:01:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.ex1.secureserver.net) (72.167.180.21) by p3plex1out01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with SMTP; 1 Apr 2011 01:01:05 -0000
Received: from P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.19]) by P3PW5EX1HT003.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.21]) with mapi; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:01:05 -0700
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:00:57 -0700
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Error extensibility proposal
Thread-Index: AcvwA4B00M8n8MF8QGKokzYHobGCPgABIP9Q
Message-ID: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E7234465664D708@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E723446564305D9@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <4D951BC4.3070608@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4D951BC4.3070608@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error extensibility proposal
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:59:27 -0000

Yeah, 4/1 and it gives people the chance to express their views at the meeting.

It's a draft... which is the way this WG has been more effective in getting people's attentions to proposal. I'll include it in -14 and take it out if we have another solution or lack of consensus when I do -15 with the first security consideration section.

EHL

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im]
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 5:27 PM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error extensibility proposal
> 
> On 3/30/11 1:01 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> 
> > Please send any feedback, comments, support, and objections by 3/1
> 
> I think you meant 4/1. :)
> 
> > (so it can be included or not in -14).
> 
> Given how busy things are during IETF week, I'm sure that many people
> who are in Prague for the meeting might not have time to review the
> proposal in 48 hours or less. I know I won't have time to double-check
> the list threads and document history on this point until next week.
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email