Re: [OAUTH-WG] Reviewing draft-ietf-oauth-v2-21

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Fri, 16 September 2011 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1077421F8509 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77X0QLaRTdNc for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1C121F8C47 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [87.142.251.121] (helo=[192.168.71.26]) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1R4dmC-000768-TU; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:08:41 +0200
Message-ID: <4E739EC8.4080309@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:08:56 +0200
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <CALaySJJwhNXH19uOK+Cdy_WoJmfAN0msrPE2edFZHYbZCmRXYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJwhNXH19uOK+Cdy_WoJmfAN0msrPE2edFZHYbZCmRXYA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC1vbmxpbmUuZGU=
Cc: oauth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Reviewing draft-ietf-oauth-v2-21
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:06:28 -0000

I reviewed the diffs and it looks ok.

regards,
Torsten.

Am 07.09.2011 17:59, schrieb Barry Leiba:
> As you've all probably seen, Eran has posted version 21 of the OAuth
> base spec, in which he believes he's addressed all comments and issues
> that came up in the review of version 20.  We should be ready to send
> this to the IESG.
>
> Everyone who had comments or issues, please review -21 and make sure
> that your concerns have been handled to your satisfaction (or that
> there was no consensus to make a change).  And we encourage everyone
> to review the changes from -20 to -21, to make sure Eran didn't
> inadvertently break anything along the way.
>
> The -21 is here:  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-21
> And diffs from -20 can be found here:
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-oauth-v2-21.txt
>
> We'll give it until the end of next week, while I work on the shepherd
> writeup.  Comments, please, by 16 September.  A few affirmative notes
> saying, "Yes, I reviewed it and it looks good," will also be helpful.
> Keep in mind, as you review, that pet changes are out of scope at this
> point.  We're just reviewing -21 to make sure (1) it doesn't break
> anything from -20, and (2) it isn't missing anything that was brought
> up in WGLC.  New issues will have to be very serious, indeed, in order
> to be considered now.
>
> Also, a note on the thread that Mike Thomas started about the OAuth
> problem statement and threats:
> I did encourage him to start the discussion, and I think it can be a
> useful conversation.  I do NOT think it will or should result in a
> change to the base spec, but it might feed into the threat model
> document (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel), as Torsten, et al, move
> that toward completion.  Remember that the base spec encourages
> readers to refer to the threat model document for more detailed
> descriptions of threats and attacks.
>
> Barry, as chair
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth