IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] refined idea for documents..

Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com> Mon, 28 September 2009 07:25 UTC

Return-Path: <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D1128C0D0 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.703, BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Wm+yHVy+uwv for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com (mail-ew0-f228.google.com [209.85.219.228]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595153A67EA for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so5790355ewy.42 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SETd6gyudBn2WqkxKUtrESzezmoA2hCGWr5DRxHu+q4=; b=QhMldbUM58rXLWuDcTYgjxjstwfk1ikB0/dOz+s9xDP8OnGIp2vfTxnoDQUNBGB78I IB/C1Vb06JLcemPU1ZnMqEOx1lc7O9sxqxk8bj1hV6yo5tI/Of3E0xY6BV9A0+hkJE+P KRRKO7fK1fyyNeCR4Jh5tPKdoBhEyOgOGQuzs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=La4Drim9NWengVcm09r+gK3r0H8/9a114VOSARWaqv3wVypLWBP4XJlGEl+aEfU21y xewz4yky1Q6+3U4Hvf8ggRoWfb/RCcc+VYU1pDBoL6Az8La8Cph4DeJeHp7/iV/bAqTP B0pgUy1DagdjBRBHBKKRwIFeoqU+628LGiRNc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.88.209 with SMTP id a59mr699045wef.50.1254122797538; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3a880e2c0909270811s7abc399crcad8c0eed3027a1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3a880e2c0909031149kda16e64neb4184ca70f59745@mail.gmail.com> <9b8a8de40909270716s25dc3a13v1a11917c3d37ce3a@mail.gmail.com> <3a880e2c0909270811s7abc399crcad8c0eed3027a1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 08:26:37 +0100
Message-ID: <e0b04bba0909280026t384323f6n4880f67927af8227@mail.gmail.com>
From: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e6d7837eda1de204749e37fc"
Cc: Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] refined idea for documents..
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:25:23 -0000

A good way of proceeding would be to discuss David's deployment patterns
first, before cranking out a new intro document.  After all, there is a lot
of good material there, hinting at many useful use cases.  Then any new
document would have a chance of reflecting the viewpoints of the group so
far, and building on the consensus.

Ref:  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-ogp-layering-00


Morgaine.






======================================

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>wrote:

> yup. we're actually in the process of adding the deployment pattern
> stuff to the intro doc. great minds think alike!
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Infinity
> > Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> hey peeps...
> >>
> >> i was thinking about it, and came up with a slightly different list of
> >> documents:
> >>
> >> * intro and goals (used to be called intro and requirements)
> >> * abstract type system (used to be called LLSD)
> >> * foundations
> >> * the VWRAP trust/security model
> >> * virtual world description format
> >> * client application launch message
> >> * agent presence establishment
> >> * avatar format
> >> * asset format and access
> >> * chat/voice establishment
> >> * user profile access
> >> * time sensitive messages
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> * intro and goals ( based on
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-ogp-intro-00 )
> >>  * social context of virtual worlds - why they're interesting
> >>  * very high level description of virtual world characteristics - not
> >> what a virtual world "is" as much as features of a virtual world you
> >> may not have thought about.
> >>  * how VWRAP virtual worlds differ from other virtual worlds - how
> >> OpenSim and SecondLife differ on a technology level from WoW
> >>  * protocol objectives and goals - specific features of the protocol
> >>
> >>  * this doc is it's own document because we think there's a need for
> >> a lot of background, and it's mostly non-technical.
> >
> > [snip ]
> > I would suggest to add some stuff
> > from http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-levine-ogp-layering
> > The use cases given there would come a long way to clarify the current
> > confusion over what we can call a virtual world and what the main seat of
> > policy is in these cases.
> > Vaughn
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email