[Ohai] Updated OHTTP draft
Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 26 October 2021 00:22 UTC
Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: ohai@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ohai@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B553A0DF6 for <ohai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=awWBRL39; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=J6nIhN6V
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYjjyxMEfwLo for <ohai@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 505D13A0DF3 for <ohai@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DEC5C0375 for <ohai@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:21:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:21:58 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s= fm3; bh=D1v4pVTJC5gS5GprMA+01qupzpCdhAQfXVPT4qKEhp4=; b=awWBRL39 WxfMoHzVC00zg9JTUJw5/qvjbxSbVr+E5KHQwMMdm0qoqwURKH9zbRLZzfayxVp0 OCKGgrPL3pDx95XjfGrLE75a0Vz7ZFNk3r0Rw7Grkp6nWVlcOl9LqW1e0NYwm1bu W015RGEnrkijuCh/MEcXxpaOcsioUSFrAPoJwc1EEGaLwU9Rt3UTlWMZnJEjqNAE a5ls2vkZ1ftk+O0GO+ctDeToC27FyIWIGtuYwz6Wk2hVs9oIbztmTSHQbfwkWIch R1/J0lAufWkTCG7elbHdOfsrEeQsU0x/iq/NmM1PzOASTdA3WIOSff8jAa3b5bpa oqZMCYidvlEOTw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=D1v4pVTJC5gS5GprMA+01qupzpCdh AQfXVPT4qKEhp4=; b=J6nIhN6VSLId/FYpMb5Cts3+U2Dm6yJ7gRH7j0FXUS4wB A6ynaezGEKR5w/00+7rE2Jp4/rHIZLz36VfqhZ70wVC/bG7VBEzuSAnfjc7nagNj 1wBuYayTW5j/TkB7PijCz0uybr1QegWIdUv/bdzRHvlp0HKA9pSzFcOIssedmXbw psp3Gs9EdwywNqAg/lWs5cuhDEgTSJ6/E3h8tcNbUYg57SP2HpHOergxjsAzwXpa cpfUNoRhoKCkBAYKfKHn/qj2vu+k6hklGKiHHbNV1Fh8iqF7svLqa2vSU3v8tKHf PemOvHFeHewdJNJDDcZk5lAHXqU0vZf/pU2NM5xvQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Jkp3YUqrHJbrEv9JYay65n61RPzLcjb_RzMi3b09C5Zrse517hhAhw> <xme:Jkp3YaqGRwhuo2wfa-xD4ivLax_qFHJxS-8M-5A1tZ3X4TaJuOYfdutwJNSVySxyx aYukxwe09ZTM6NBpCE>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdefiedgvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfffhffvufgtsehttdertd erredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigv nhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevledutdektdehvdfgvdetve etlefgtdfghfeuteefieeifedtteffhedvheegkeenucffohhmrghinhepihgvthhfrdho rhhgpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Jkp3YZNqiVHEAbMMxW7xJIVf1hnDBKcKunu2htrLddneLs_iOYEyog> <xmx:Jkp3Yb7eqStcLzGQraX2vvniy6xIYMZznLeLZFnEt262wVOpXBWDdQ> <xmx:Jkp3YT5P3oy7YngIVUtJ9uPyC2CDPO7xH2Z14-cFonICwKPMSYl8qw> <xmx:Jkp3YVF1F2zmSy6ty3r3TI8oYEYQ2ye6f7nEw-GGWWCr3bW41dF-xg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 52E833C0821; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:21:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1369-gd055fb5e7c-fm-20211018.002-gd055fb5e
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <4995bed0-38bf-420d-9570-c5ac8b6ae0fa@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:21:39 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: ohai@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ohai/iL_O2jRT-PLLQCzm4H4O1T-Beyc>
Subject: [Ohai] Updated OHTTP draft
X-BeenThere: ohai@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Oblivious HTTP Application Intermediation <ohai.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ohai>, <mailto:ohai-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ohai/>
List-Post: <mailto:ohai@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ohai-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ohai>, <mailto:ohai-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 00:22:04 -0000
Hey everyone, I've just pushed a no-op revision of the oblivious HTTP so that it has a recognizable working group name. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thomson-ohai-ohttp-00.html I'd like to take this opportunity to list a few of the issues that I think we should be discussing in the event that this work is adopted. Here are the items that I think are most interesting: 1. Streaming request/responses https://github.com/unicorn-wg/oblivious-http/issues/75 Should we add the ability to stream messages? 2. Additional data https://github.com/unicorn-wg/oblivious-http/issues/70 What additional data might need to be exposed to the proxy or server on the *outside* of the encrypted envelope? 3. Anti-replay https://github.com/unicorn-wg/oblivious-http/issues/76 How might we better protect against replay attacks? 4. Shadow banning https://github.com/unicorn-wg/oblivious-http/issues/66 Should we allow proxies to "secretly" signal regarding potentially abusive clients so that shadow banning might be implemented? 5. Intermediary visibility https://github.com/unicorn-wg/oblivious-http/issues/61 Are there things we might do differently to ensure that intercepting intermediaries are better able to identify that this is in use? For instance, this issue suggests a new method rather than just a media type. There are a few other issues that are more minor, but these are the ones that will make substantial differences to the shape of the spec.
- [Ohai] Updated OHTTP draft Martin Thomson