IETF Logo Mail Archive

[openpgp] considering other OpenPGP work

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Thu, 04 April 2024 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5CEC193061 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.303
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.303 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="ac63wn05"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b="dYqGjLA1"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 529pXPgRd9ip for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 152B5C14F604 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 14:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1712264911; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=qBZzR0CUbWfb/ED12Qa5k5qCaWQZlTPtA+xSeVG1FCA=; b=ac63wn05x5a2g8CEeEzaLiYL8KycjEv/Iat6emLSBc4somTuc+U36G8tzhJysXECpjmQa idK2t120jMN3bLhCg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1712264911; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=qBZzR0CUbWfb/ED12Qa5k5qCaWQZlTPtA+xSeVG1FCA=; b=dYqGjLA1Ln8QwlmbVTwzv6tlCzJF4P57l5IZ0mPXYo+INFc75p5Lbdz75yH7zks10pKDX D4V7HdrfkmCaBGM0ETecOsIn8agmp26IFmhyxHs7odd6VcxpaN26cu7wp8l07WlKsg6gtIs iyMxGJkjHiwQbK8KPgiLclZNrltBiY20aWABHFzdfi2IIuMqjoPGB3cY2yOfVnvs4kh1KYn o4lyv28ncZBSNi1of7T9w41J1EV/xmZN2aizskONM+oq7wr/2lnmF3hIeRdY2Qd1Lk8xgW5 NC1Avvm07rQus7Kl6PB0GwYeuck5QuSIredVIqkgk8yXZcIYmc+TcLfn/S+Q==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50978F9DA for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:08:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5762820563; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xjMEZXEJyxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdA5BpbW0bpl5qCng/RiqwhQINrplDMSS5JsO/YO+5Zi7HCi QQfFgoAMQWCZadnIAUJBdtHCwMLCQcDFQoIApsBAh4BFiEE1HcEDHDCFWpcKYVJu36RAUlea/ cACgkQu36RAUlea/edDQD+M2QjnoEyu/TjI+gRXBpXQ5jCsnnp9FdYhaSSUW/vZ8kBAJByWlj A9aMfVaVrmvgcYw7jzJz+gmZspBRB++5LZ20NzRc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0PsLA EQQTFgoAeQMLCQdHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnEu/CS CeyWwC6j4ihJr2u/z6delsF1pvYW3ufgf1L538DFQoIApsBAh4BFiEE1HcEDHDCFWpcKYVJu3 6RAUlea/cFAmWnX5AFCQXZ8EUACgkQu36RAUlea/cjVwD+ONjdHM74rAa6EEiiqaPjlptiaZx CVqFYXnib6EbZARkBAPnnR8pW8vCBnDXHKu65jNqwF3aH761NaOqqMFfppg8GzjMEZXEJyxYJ KwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAjX25Fq2Q9IUFeHy6yByIQPBnFOedFliuEiCIUzJsENDCwMUEGBYKAS1HF AAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnwqKWsw56uoWVLIFcs7ZecJ gwpsSNevWCzbviKQ8yRLUCmwK+oAQZFgoAbwWCZXEJywkQdy0WHjXNS4FHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2F sdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnEIJSOxuw2y/UJmg5M3BLpN0JYjODZpXiEVFu 1byARzMWIQR0vATEPYYIS+hnLAZ3LRYeNc1LgQAAsH8BAKg1C5LK/D7pSkXCD+jfTSP+CqM58 iHLjh4vKhpOKsTJAQCHldtEjxJ1ksPTFgG9HihHH7qc6/wvvLw77ETMpwlrAxYhBNR3BAxwwh VqXCmFSbt+kQFJXmv3BQJlp1+rBQkCF4lgAAoJELt+kQFJXmv3ydsA/2roQZ2Jm/7iUrg/2C5 ClWA/xbvPC31LyMkGGH2/rq8tAP9BgqLuCPnNTVPqeX9+9qqMmaFq7wmvjq5I+yycAw9CDc44 BGVxCcsSCisGAQQBl1UBBQEBB0BZMsRrRaaeFSYMF1ZdfRmVgBriDUIr99eDQ085BK14DgMBC AfCwAYEGBYKAG5HFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnsazAWX tEHUPmSTmcRZAIsAsNiO8k0hdjsfRlRVipgJgCmwwWIQTUdwQMcMIValwphUm7fpEBSV5r9wU CZadfqwUJAheJYAAKCRC7fpEBSV5r90AjAPwLgY1iKiFJEj32SVD5f721929l79VxQB5FlQss x1n5kQEA6Uct2tPvbB6T7p5KG3Gl+tbi7oJAuxFmpkpW5/N2Owg=
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:08:23 -0400
Message-ID: <87y19sg7js.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/2xcE1gPefk3IGlyloPDC6Kb_GlQ>
Subject: [openpgp] considering other OpenPGP work
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 21:08:37 -0000

Hi OpenPGP WG--

Our milestones suggest that we are slightly late at considering other
drafts for adoption as working group content:

   https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/openpgp/about/#autoid-2

This thread is intended to get folks talking about what in-charter work
the WG is interested in taking on next, in parallel to
draft-ietf-openpgp-pqc.

The milestones explicitly name the following two concepts as likely
candidates:

- persistent symmetric keys
- superseded keys

I looked for OpenPGP-related documents here:

   https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/openpgp/documents/

I see the following individual draft about Persistent Symmetric keys,
from Daniel Huigens:

   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huigens-openpgp-persistent-symmetric-keys/

In the same list of documents, i see this individual draft about
replacement keys, from Daphne Shaw and Andrew Gallagher, which appears
to cover the idea of "superseded keys" mentioned in the milestones:

   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gallagher-openpgp-replacementkey/

Daniel, Daphne, Andrew, are these documents anything that you would be
interested in considering for working group adoption?  If so, please
take a minute and write a paragraph or two to the list here about the
draft and why you think it would be useful for us to consider it as a
group.



If anyone else has other work that they would like the working group to
consider as a possible work item in the near future, now might also be a
good time to propose it, so that the working group can consider it.

Regards,

        --dkg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email