Re: [openpgp] Question on computing v5 signatures
Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net> Thu, 02 May 2019 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <HeikoStamer@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19B012043B for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2019 09:35:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h4aIPK-8uZ5X for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2019 09:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C1D012044C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2019 09:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1556814901; bh=j5lnz02IEnHObIASpRuCzsdyerVXFfXRMLhnCuYpruY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Dbj2FLfXhSN+GN7gvF1UXCc19jZ0U8zsssSR/Gc4SvnCruiEQQm5mZJ6Byq8emqry yJkdESnm5NHIre6YfBEB5mSS3RSghnAy/478WSvl5ZWrZgPSn0tqyT4hsGsOCXgWS8 RS31dKfcF/V2szMGZCkaZ+ttWTDeJKJ2Ddo0xIJY=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([80.132.239.73]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MV67y-1hE5TP0kVi-00S612 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 May 2019 18:35:01 +0200
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <cdf3ec1d-25b5-0244-459d-11774c22b161@gmx.net> <877eb9wegx.wl-neal@walfield.org>
From: Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=HeikoStamer@gmx.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQGiBDdYKNkRBACRdsFzaQn0HChOX38WHXlIYcNZAAxBQxa7gdmPXTUK+tgwQuwAr/XViQxn ExKwyOteRhwHZNSYdoKPlCOJ3c3FWCKAdflINr53NvN/qnnaF+3M1HaluiwVdfHD9a0+k7fd NFZMq2bTpzSCQBsPGipSK0K8ET8UPrXm54pXhqYL2wCgsuMBOv64bmg2zjg6vHSTKADGykcD /Agjoa7y7Cpifk4WEKDKu8nlrE9OFOJppjZ9bdJedrmZq5A/jHr35UOgbZItTmgBiz7bfMLq 7HD05ZQ3BplBmmiE0412f55GadCjN4vvnCdTqZ/ewzWdz/rzQGaJm9IvW6rupuFgrTx0GJhf we7cr6GQQo0nqA0LMCyhGHQASC56A/9NOroBzLM6wl9QlE9lybxd3cxI2UnrfHIu63tklFKF vL1XnjyJ4YR0sDs6/f56JbtEGUKTCI7ZAw+241Va4MrbDVmmsGJjQBcKxNbHDfkkjoJ9NBwr pUo2nMT3BWyKHCfnMqoyT+nN04b0Em1ffbhptKiLJSeY1mcPxvA1h7PrKbQlSGVpa28gU3Rh bWVyIDxoZWlrby5zdGFtZXJAcG9zdGVvLmRlPohiBBMRAgAiAhsDAh4BAheABQJTnH9pBgsJ CAcDAgYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQAKCRBPWE64+yvhT4n9AJwNsUcN5bx9/gtUs4LMmqBcePkQKwCf Y4FmM1D4rmTWsHQ1NRgsiqQhc265Aw0EN1gq2RAMAK4ZTZJZeaOmjIYhf9QfN7rQ6iXEF20r OG8NkeHLVLPw02t2QjejO5g4zGQplktPD+JCKBU1B/DL7l8BTDopofw4+fAierJ6C4jo/AbS pArZxaVJNkOVNbwHYPdCmO3yxieeMYQgYoZvtkBSA4OZZh2xLfmi3IRBPRSf+REiqPJBy9aA 0f7634vKldTG7R4PR2UP+THjpM/2SpNiyv/y9ZaEPYn3zHRkWsUw3xAMIiE73Hen6o/J9KIB 2e4jiI3VFiwq0LaKRv5whzltjKydGi2zVqcDLc93lDxsW2OXPE89GH3S/9irlEz/ciBuxtLT MMjSV3OeV34Mid7Muz8RE6whOaZteuEgAcLxONxe3FZHeG2cUuciCZDdFqDRtB6w0XhjltdI ZzD8zHBZyboRfBxubtRzriTxjFcxjI3L5df9uLWjuvkl0fSYpQV5dMX1Yus2kXiMHKUeTVE0 NtHqSnozzu88l6D+dCHX0i1BDFgkZi70oGEEaEW0NQgDItOdNwADBQv/a0d7nasV4JW9mjtF nlJDL9pyXHuGc+y9vfJNdy+DlzuHB44vtl+yH9ecTdpxE7RgB8ZvQvEwUmV+keBw+5NkR3ms +AnPrwZxwAIE/DxnwyBAQETkf9SIBH8cz0BCYQ37B+N4OW/pkYSWadjn2Bgi4IZRWyrDmnAI KwsGzfGUxPIKI3AMcRFFqjdhMaFo3L2GwJ2o0dBxd1LN0Xo6298ydcjrtAbKI1xuNXBfBAeU YCzGjg7cUw6XXfyjU5rTQkxKTu13xsKUwCnse7jOvDnfdNnYC+n7o4WNQBDhTiF0QMZ482ba FtCKcqdQJ3fQ9uioh1kOZirhJJ40xtYrDLcS3H9rQZff0X+CeOa94EdJYYYH7BIpysrfJ9c1 cxrg5brzeb9ofWaxLQvRIXBubbDtd0AunQMJXTfXHUmgYCdzSZVyy1tUzso1QacI4D0PhRIo euP8ihlWhqnHRv5tY8Ue18uFybaVIOWrsXXjQOVBUvXFmYCc9ykvJcyYSadLYkJliEYEGBEC AAYFAjdYKtkACgkQT1hOuPsr4U9xEwCeKB7jHvmUrWnuxsqx2Flvq2/gIk8AoKkOpGf2jud+ 8uWi5c1ohHWeuLtz
Message-ID: <948453e5-48f5-959c-3951-2d643d046d57@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 18:34:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <877eb9wegx.wl-neal@walfield.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:oPHwmrxQvmnmmraiTAshKKmP0ADq970LG5G4wKHqTGBZZnQTNw5 VJAeClyaz5ZewKbkf96dzcJS3zP3X49Vge1a0fibB9gbqY97yjIjRN8WfQteEFueWirxEIC 6u1LApPUxIQwDgayhV837yKfSyYP6Y/Y4hVPlyGE12okQAQeWAL761nEHR7d7/xii8juB3i 0QGAI8kT/z4zeZ1KkXlyA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:mksswuTeXvw=:BUHwOONg/0GVgTxOOHFMAl UgDdoFaTBqPD+TOciFsEU7eoA4wTmoPpZsibqKVCz+IQ9Axc0UHVWuPWaWMqm7IURzz+vMcS3 ND0b4ClTpc2WoJydar6GmHtsqhaRC/q86lR+y7baQaWCZLQsgqbG3RHLlFwO6d88lfltUEOZl ibGHseqcaC8Y7N4lmWeqRVn2GBX6Ry++HbLLZfR4dDX22E5Go9XZbZ9gZRdIIK4PP/dFKv/JF 1zrj1Rcbhj+kJdKdQBtFpzzZLLT9flnVH/oaKtF90thGv+sxdW1UwVn6IWWZn0UlOoGuy73dM mhpD16bVfdsqrDpBFJr3LQZu8W0tz/XeYevY2/hSNOw0Pe/UB/MnIs2GUO8LnorFZby+lVmRP /vmTo3GGwEqtArY4Az3Zrb8imYUyD/y2CTMTufGU6PpQE/eT4z8QCOQ9LF0CiYXkG5XT1FOQF iSNE9InoGJ6varT2dQKV6S14X915GGrDYaqPdNker9smrGtqe0GRItPNtFp3lthNgHFguP6Pc 5B1P2bsHnyt+Kh27H4QjRLSa7JjQjeL0j2ortY3WeaizuOkhMZp+bpbm3eCEyh2LqIQ0nXm6W RJBLvC29BsoVLXrrVS9QY5Mow1zY3BUNrGjAvADfAdYDrA8CQW+/dFde0p4QLNWBrqeDXLBaZ khWTcQsi/e4A+HIXsL2jtmRFI1ntWyALzZc+ecCL9RqKzXivHJovH+zPS47UYAlYICK5GA5EK Nw2zSZfsZlP5FUdNeBRWbExZz+QVjMUWG/8WulMZf1KNr47AFfLlHQeGgATnzVZB3tluWK51O I8xR8F1c/P+Rd5yThv2EiJoLg8sp/j0EooZTA6+bNRG4iGnZC7hhNzlzzj9ISWhMxK012rr7B kfz0v+2n85qaaL1DRzV0fTvAHGIJRJeabCXcgeV3kCkLhio6/VTKfS+TGaYjYESby0mqfUM97 heCke6/SwpA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Bnkodl956g_u8WKyH5S7bPiyK84>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Question on computing v5 signatures
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 16:35:09 -0000
Hi Neal, On 02 May 2019 08:35, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > Actually, the MPIs can be larger. They take up the remainder of the > packet. In practice, the MPIs are just a few kilobytes today, but > with post-quantum crypto, they could get very large. However, according to the current description these fields are not included in the computation of the hash and thus large MPIs (except those included e.g. by Embedded Signature subpackets in the hashed subpacket area) should not increase this specific 64-bit counter. Where I am wrong? -- Heiko
- [openpgp] Question on computing v5 signatures Heiko Stamer
- Re: [openpgp] Question on computing v5 signatures Neal H. Walfield
- Re: [openpgp] Question on computing v5 signatures Heiko Stamer
- Re: [openpgp] Question on computing v5 signatures Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] Question on computing v5 signatures brian m. carlson