Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages

Matthew Byng-Maddick <openpgp@lists.colondot.net> Tue, 16 October 2001 18:56 UTC

Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 19:40:45 +0100
From: Matthew Byng-Maddick <openpgp@lists.colondot.net>
To: vedaal <vedaal@hotmail.com>
Cc: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages
Message-ID: <20011016194045.B47206@colon.colondot.net>
References: <OE58s955E3yIyEOadke00001939@hotmail.com> <008201c15657$4b6f1880$dfc32609@transarc.ibm.com> <OE55rFHLqbp3eccmgeR00001add@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <OE55rFHLqbp3eccmgeR00001add@hotmail.com>; from vedaal@hotmail.com on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:08:23PM -0400
Organization: Colondot.net
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:08:23PM -0400, vedaal wrote:
> for an rsa key,
> if one has the session key, ciphertext and plaintext,
> and, at some point, 
> *if*
> md5 is 'fully' broken,
> would it not be possible to retrieve the secret key and passphrase?

Erm. No.

Think about the encryption process in the first place.

MBM

-- 
Matthew Byng-Maddick         <mbm@colondot.net>           http://colondot.net/

re: separation of signed and encrypted messages vedaal
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages Michael Young
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages Derek Atkins
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages vedaal
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages Michael Young
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages vedaal
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages Matthew Byng-Maddick
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages Florian Weimer
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages Werner Koch
Re: separation of signed and encrypted messages Florian Weimer