IETF Logo Mail Archive

[openpgp] Re: WG: BSI view on KEM combiners

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 09 September 2024 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7DEC151080 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 09:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.441
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.441 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iWg9xdeZ4ogG for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C78C14F6BF for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X2Ww24jpXzC6d; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 18:08:18 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1725898098; bh=XqQQAVC0tDVH0Enir6vE2lSOpL9q1+5mUW5yK8WJlmY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=D3C3Ka7Q2MXx5fBed+VmDHe4FpwuXOM9OB/TzfvBfLoE1F3B5UvXPqO8Q4I+DR0x8 dU95H06n6QL3kEhKj9V23xXLo96QVPX8CiwcAgX8abBI+D6GXP65y00AVnR9keYiCK ARKTzuJfCyptCXuV3pWP7/CTdhLVNGNKNE+lRRdM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WDHywKqwpW08; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 18:08:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 18:08:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 878991301958; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867FF1301957; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 12:08:16 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
In-Reply-To: <20240909145649.389542.qmail@cr.yp.to>
Message-ID: <9c3fdda4-dc93-d804-ed5e-3766027d89aa@nohats.ca>
References: <20240909145649.389542.qmail@cr.yp.to>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: D7ILZERGVFFAHL2DAOIGWSOFTBQJ6QBX
X-Message-ID-Hash: D7ILZERGVFFAHL2DAOIGWSOFTBQJ6QBX
X-MailFrom: paul@nohats.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: WG: BSI view on KEM combiners
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/K6VSImhm_B0CTRij6t7oirTetxU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:openpgp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:openpgp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:openpgp-leave@ietf.org>

On Mon, 9 Sep 2024, D. J. Bernstein wrote:

> 
> Paul Wouters writes:
>      [ regarding draft-connolly-cfrg-xwing-kem: ]
>>>> That draft will be adopted in CFRG.
>>> Evidence?
>> It seems to me, there is consensus for that document
>
> Evidence? Links?

"it seems" is not a legal verdict. The point is that the entire
discussion belongs more at CFRG than here at OpenPGP. I am not
the person or role to make consensus calls for CFRG.

> the much more specific X-Wing  proposal that you're advocating (care to explain why?)

I am not advocating anything.

> The CFRG chairs

[...]

I do not see value replaying the CFRG discussions on this list.

>> You can always lend a helping hand to the people involved there or
>> express your support for the document on the cfrg list to ensure the
>> community there is aware.
>
> I've already been providing detailed input to the discussion (see, e.g.,
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/8rs9KcfxfKvgn6FKGs7jMenmPQA/)

It's excellent that this discussion is happening on the CFRG list.
Please continue it there.

Paul

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status