Re: [openpgp] Minor fixes for RFC 4880bis
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Fri, 24 May 2019 06:30 UTC
Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF95120088 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 23:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZLAYO9wtZSS for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2019 23:30:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8794120047 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2019 23:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=K273PkHXSOPqkKWi5a0rwfqmoePA8KrMP8Jusz+LOXw=; b=XFynDXM8iQFKbXHM/uDW7tywlQ +u0DTMXRkMvb4omhAE7XGFZlRpgm1PLs4FIKZYBp9PnM7zb11DI/Ar7XGtTG8gacrZnpwlcwkDUhf 2b8JtGXIl1JC/cnqiuWD1GrfY8KK818j2iC/qIzGziT3AXUg5ZrbknILSfwXXA3uY6R4=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1hU3iT-00028j-BI for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:30:09 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1hU3ds-00025D-6c; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:25:24 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net>
Cc: OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <cd586797-390f-210b-5d09-35ea8625319e@gmx.net>
Organisation: GnuPG e.V.
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: Heiko Stamer <HeikoStamer@gmx.net>, OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 08:25:12 +0200
In-Reply-To: <cd586797-390f-210b-5d09-35ea8625319e@gmx.net> (Heiko Stamer's message of "Thu, 23 May 2019 21:27:27 +0200")
Message-ID: <87a7fc5pyv.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=FLiR_high_security_eavesdropping_Black-Ops_Deaths_ISEC_cybercash_CDC"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/Qr0DPK1T2MyY1j9soZVeRshMpqY>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Minor fixes for RFC 4880bis
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 06:30:13 -0000
On Thu, 23 May 2019 21:27, HeikoStamer@gmx.net said: > some months ago I've opened this merge request: > https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/merge_requests/15 Sorry, I missed them because I usually check only the ticked mails here from the ML. I'll add them for the next revision. > Unfortunately, the most recent version 07 of the draft does not contain > those almost only editorial changes. Are there any objections? I don't think so. I had to get out a new revision to avoid an expired I-D. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
- [openpgp] Minor fixes for RFC 4880bis Heiko Stamer
- Re: [openpgp] Minor fixes for RFC 4880bis Werner Koch