Other -15 comments

David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> Mon, 05 December 2005 20:03 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EjMYf-0001gH-I6 for openpgp-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:03:33 -0500
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA04645 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:02:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jB5JoOQo093630; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:50:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id jB5JoO4d093629; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:50:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from foobar.cs.jhu.edu (foobar.cs.jhu.edu [128.220.13.173]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jB5JoNGx093623 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 11:50:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dshaw@jabberwocky.com)
Received: from walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.60.132.70]) by foobar.cs.jhu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB5JoMS18607 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:50:22 -0500
Received: from grover.jabberwocky.com (grover.jabberwocky.com [172.24.84.28]) by walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jB5JoIX6023736 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:50:18 -0500
Received: from grover.jabberwocky.com (grover.jabberwocky.com [127.0.0.1]) by grover.jabberwocky.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB5JoG5A024799 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:50:16 -0500
Received: (from dshaw@localhost) by grover.jabberwocky.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id jB5JoGGF024798 for ietf-openpgp@imc.org; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:50:16 -0500
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:50:16 -0500
From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Other -15 comments
Message-ID: <20051205195016.GA24566@jabberwocky.com>
Mail-Followup-To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
OpenPGP: id=99242560; url=http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>

I recently did a read-over of -15.  I've already sent the minor text
nits in other mail.  These are comments that rise (marginally) above
simple wording questions.  Much apologies for the late submission.

*****

5.5.2. Public Key Packet Formats says "Third, there are minor
weaknesses in the MD5 hash algorithm that make developers prefer other
algorithms."  Suggest dropping the word "minor".

*****

Section 5.5.2. Public Key Packet Formats says:

  V3 keys are deprecated; an implementation SHOULD NOT generate a V3
  key, but MAY accept it.

but section 11.1. Key Structures says:

  V3 keys are deprecated. Implementations MUST NOT generate new V3
  keys, but MAY continue to use existing ones.

These can't both be correct.  I lean towards MUST NOT here,
personally.

*****

The first two paragraphs in section 6.4. Decoding Radix-64 contradict
each other.  The first says that all non-radix-64 characters must be
ignored.  The second says that non-radix-64 characters probably
indicate a transmission error, "about which a warning message or even
a message rejection might be appropriate under some circumstances".

Suggest going with the second.

*****

David