Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"?
Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org> Wed, 14 August 2002 21:12 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA25200 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 17:12:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g7EKuvn14708 for ietf-openpgp-bks; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.epost.de (web.epost.de [193.28.100.164] (may be forged)) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7EKutw14704 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dirichlet.mathematik.uni-bielefeld.de (80.130.173.9) by mail.epost.de (5.5.056) (authenticated as Marc.Mutz@epost.de) id 3D59336300019931; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:55:22 +0200
From: Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org>
Organization: KDE
To: john.dlugosz@kodak.com, OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"?
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:42:09 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.6
References: <OF94CAB39F.FCF0A0BA-ON86256C15.00507ACA@kodak.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF94CAB39F.FCF0A0BA-ON86256C15.00507ACA@kodak.com>
X-PGP-Key: 0xBDBFE838
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Description: clearsigned data
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200208142242.10470@sendmail.mutz.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by above.proper.com id g7EKuuw14705
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 14 August 2002 16:40, john.dlugosz@kodak.com wrote: > In http://netscape.com.com/2100-1105-949506.html?type=pt there is a > vague mention of a problem: <snip> > Does anybody know more about this? Can a minor improvement to the > new -bis draft fix it? <snip> Do you mean this: www.counterpane.com/pgp-attack.html or something else? Marc - -- Mutig warf sich die kleine Überwachungskamera zwischen Täter Opfer! --Rena Tangens / FoeBuD e.V. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9WsCh3oWD+L2/6DgRAqVFAJ9z9m/5tla4yV5lGeMmJOdrEnJMWACg+hNj 5mx4M2stDrwzlOfbUK4ncw4= =WEJd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? john.dlugosz
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Derek Atkins
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Rodney Thayer
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Derek Atkins
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Marc Mutz
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? john.dlugosz
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Jon Callas
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Lutz Donnerhacke
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Rodney Thayer
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Adam Back
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Carl Ellison
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Dominikus Scherkl
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Peter Gutmann
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Werner Koch
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? David Hopwood
- Re: Anybody know details about Schneier's "flaw"? Peter Gutmann