RE: Text canonicalization
"Dominikus Scherkl" <Dominikus.Scherkl@glueckkanja.com> Mon, 21 October 2002 10:45 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (mail.proper.com [208.184.76.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA23229 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:45:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id g9LAVMI10769 for ietf-openpgp-bks; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.glueckkanja.com (mail.glueckkanja.com [62.8.243.3]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g9LAVKW10762 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: Text canonicalization
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:31:14 +0200
Message-ID: <2F89C141B5B67645BB56C03853757882481693@guk1d002.glueckkanja.org>
Thread-Topic: Text canonicalization
thread-index: AcJ2z3PMl4FjzSczQc+D9eFI79WGYACGzkGA
From: Dominikus Scherkl <Dominikus.Scherkl@glueckkanja.com>
To: Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>, ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by above.proper.com id g9LAVLW10765
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi. > > What about the other line ending characters? With Unicode (or even > > ISO-8859-x close to an EBCDIC environment), there a few more > > characters which could end a line. > > Let me repeat this question. ;-) > > If you look at the discussion about the XML 1.1 specification, you'll > see that there is a real ambiguity. All behind the 128-bit ASCII code should be left unchanged. This will do no harm, because all other soft- and hardware in the trasportsystem will do the same. If an editor interpret those "in text format comands", it might do (for display reasons) but should also not change the text!!! Again: This is not a topic to PGP at all, because those chars are uncritical to the mail-system. The whole thing about CR and LF is, that the mail sytem on some systems change them, insert additional whitespace to the end or cut it of - nothing like this will happen to unicode line endings. Best Regards -- Dominikus Scherkl dominikus.scherkl@glueckkanja.com
- Text canonicalization hal
- Re: Text canonicalization Florian Weimer
- Re: Text canonicalization Werner Koch
- Re: Text canonicalization Jon Callas
- Re: Text canonicalization hal
- Re: Text canonicalization David Shaw
- Re: Text canonicalization vedaal
- Re: Text canonicalization Jon Callas
- Re: Text canonicalization David Shaw
- Re: Text canonicalization Florian Weimer
- RE: Text canonicalization Dominikus Scherkl