[openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities
Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com> Fri, 25 September 2026 19:43 UTC
Received: from fum.andrewg.com (fum.andrewg.com [135.181.198.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6E531 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:43:40 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mx.ietf.org; dkim=pass header.d=andrewg.com header.s=andrewg-com header.b="EXoB/tYC"; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=andrewg.com; spf=pass (mx.ietf.org: domain of andrewg@andrewg.com designates 135.181.198.78 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=andrewg@andrewg.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andrewg.com; s=andrewg-com; t=1790365412; bh=jQ7McKbwOufrbb3HXn8nctTmUI9mucW1zh7KlCY5My0=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=EXoB/tYCvKhQF7GLMiSR92AIttBfUXie12Zsnjiq6pSoVz7BEaR29Bzm2wVSxEB1w 8oftHrc9CXAtJglpuFusfHSmC/SMvQgAjJVV1f08cnuxP1CUTn1zUvR3HjsqQ8m300 I4rDKTI/IfZuvcp9Fx1471G8aJo4/cO7XO1vElzfZ+1uaKKuS8mNE6PKOcoD2GqQaw eLTnLcbOr0xuwNYWvtRwoMI0nx0lJxCDewtVAhiCvvA/YRGq5Irr3SLfv7fcrZWg+Y PINDGOI3o4X0pVeuYNeXlXzHcouXaEXFXXRRJAdMx7G2HDF5N5beqWDvuB+w3lp4xl DIhwEBPTNMD6A==
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [176.61.115.103]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by fum.andrewg.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 86B4D5EEAF; Fri, 25 Sep 2026 19:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg@andrewg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:43:18 +0100
Message-Id: <B7B1C94C-DDB3-43AD-82AA-5F6697C04C47@andrewg.com>
References: <87qzih40no.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <87qzih40no.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (23G83)
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Message-ID-Hash: MGYU65EBAMBS6Y7ENKGBCUONUIJBSS46
X-Message-ID-Hash: MGYU65EBAMBS6Y7ENKGBCUONUIJBSS46
X-MailFrom: andrewg@andrewg.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; header-match-openpgp.ietf.org-0; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Subject: [openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/hYOqWHABlsLhQAmGEDRxo2OwuSg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:openpgp-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:openpgp-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:openpgp-leave@ietf.org>
On 25 Sep 2026, at 20:11, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote: > > I'm not sure i have a strong preference, but the latter approach (implicit capabilities) seemed easiest to write up. I've taken a crack at writing it down here I like the general direction here, but I think it would be simpler (and more future proof) to invert the enumeration - in other words, say that by default all capabilities are allowed, and just list any exceptions or caveats. A
- [openpgp] implicit PSK key capabilities Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- [openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities Andrew Gallagher
- [openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- [openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities Andrew Gallagher
- [openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities Daniel Huigens
- [openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities Heiko Schäfer
- [openpgp] Re: implicit PSK key capabilities Daniel Huigens