Re: [openpgp] Ed25519 in a draft

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 28 April 2021 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A253A122B for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0ESLt7kIvPr for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA2213A1285 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 09:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVk2Y1HQVzKGy; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:03:49 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1619625829; bh=vKPmBlMtZsmihU0X2pvXPtn2Pr+sdiYEGV2TPwrBzWw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=tRfUPid4qsOZz1hza2HLeW0XSotM26T1XFBi6EeABIw65HG91FDhpJm3GH3faZll3 qvjvx/edKv6fnfhHofYET7Bcc2553jQHOZH1HEZ56v1iR85IOq7lgzWTrPb14Wtq81 iGIPMNrjMwlHnX3hb14ZU8pUiJhz274ykPhW4hpc=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i2kFrbViVjyM; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:03:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:03:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02C8C6029A70; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:03:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4E766B7C; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:03:46 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:03:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <sU3FUMNkHv6tddQD5InZ98sqTN4H6PCCl8EhXgxp4hO8zw_o-wXWgDYshjoii8y7ufljLjE4vw8hF_GCqD5vH-DJAtqPgQWU6-N0x7S2M-k=@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <a678759a-7d2a-f6fa-98f1-e3e9312c23d5@nohats.ca>
References: <sU3FUMNkHv6tddQD5InZ98sqTN4H6PCCl8EhXgxp4hO8zw_o-wXWgDYshjoii8y7ufljLjE4vw8hF_GCqD5vH-DJAtqPgQWU6-N0x7S2M-k=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/lbNWyu7BWIEFX8caPW0tZwMes4w>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Ed25519 in a draft
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:04:03 -0000

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021, Daniel Huigens wrote:

> Would it be possible to get a new draft out with Ed25519 in it?

Apologies. we will get an updated draft out today.

> We (OpenPGP.js) would like to switch to generating ECC keys by
> default, and the current situation where Ed25519 is not in any
> non-expired draft is a bit awkward, in that context.

understood.

Paul