IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] V5 Fingerprint again

Leo Gaspard <leo@gaspard.io> Wed, 01 March 2017 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <leo@gaspard.io>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450471295E1 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:27:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.236
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.236 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iA7dr1abhSMu for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:27:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FED412943B for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:27:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([91.121.91.176]) by mwinf5d81 with ME id qnTb1u0013oJ4gz03nTb1G; Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:27:36 +0100
X-ME-Helo: [0.0.0.0]
X-ME-Auth: bGVvLmdhc3BhcmRAd2FuYWRvby5mcg==
X-ME-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:27:36 +0100
X-ME-IP: 91.121.91.176
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+Lwju5i5xHt=ma6Ush4_4dfZNwOi2=2km+6Qja+sDbkvbxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leo Gaspard <leo@gaspard.io>
Message-ID: <d18152a6-084c-3728-809f-f14b86e85752@gaspard.io>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:27:22 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwju5i5xHt=ma6Ush4_4dfZNwOi2=2km+6Qja+sDbkvbxg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CQ0sm4DsnrDm4g0PJ1qoVHA69wEm1j3lI"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/sqlmwF4FbnFLdg0c4mNXJ7u3j80>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] V5 Fingerprint again
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 23:27:40 -0000

On 03/01/2017 06:30 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> H(x) = SHA-2-512(x)

Hoping this hasn't been discussed before, but... is there a reason for
not picking SHA3-512? (or SHAKE256 with 25*8 bits of output if willing
to stay at 25 octets for the fingerprint)

This should push back the next required switch to a v6 key.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email