Re: [openpgp] IESG conflict review check...
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Fri, 24 July 2015 10:56 UTC
Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D0A1A86FD for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eJXKNrAgu8mW for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0461A1A15 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (dhcp-a2cb.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.162.203]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F99CF984; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 06:56:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0733B2033D; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:56:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <55B20EFD.9080800@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <55B20EFD.9080800@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:56:52 +0200
Message-ID: <87io99hlhn.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/yKvp8eYwDN_JeP-3kTFpNLaGvYE>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] IESG conflict review check...
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:56:58 -0000
On Fri 2015-07-24 12:10:05 +0200, Stephen Farrell wrote: > The IESG has been asked to do a 5742 conflict review [3] > of a document that describes an application of PGP so > I thought I'd check here. > > So the question is if the WG think there is any conflict > between this specification [4] and the work of this WG. > > IMO the answer is no (having quickly scanned the document). i also agree that the answer is "no" -- I do not think this spec conflicts with the work of the WG. It's basically saying "use OpenPGP to sign and/or encrypt the transcript before sending, with a specific mime structure". we're not aiming to get in the way of that. > [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davin-eesst/ the ascii art here is kind of "wow". --dkg
- [openpgp] IESG conflict review check... Stephen Farrell
- Re: [openpgp] IESG conflict review check... Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] IESG conflict review check... Derek Atkins
- Re: [openpgp] IESG conflict review check... Christopher LILJENSTOLPE