[openpgp] Recommended default for SHA3-based signatures
Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> Thu, 05 October 2017 15:29 UTC
Return-Path: <noloader@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386FA1321A2 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sq9cMMQLSD5j for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05283132198 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id q4so7615689oic.7 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=I4nhM9KTYTLoFZz4BUi417N4wl3WbV4LNgkZ/M1M1es=; b=Ze2QOMglfYduUd8GfJyBVFOmzsLdipQazhWQjsYJfhybe/qwJHqCvzByvoDtru9TRy 8QC0NjrtI2Ml224nU6p0WIDVqwg6uGT4u+izXgnB1hh/RNkDUAccSdHcOh3jtF5f62al mBdXpl3546qqj6srGu4N/qWyedYIous4rByEYoel4D2pR+yb7xSH38gT8SBgv7wDp/V+ Pb6Kq49jvkvlCIQlSI5/MfpctinC4RhY0CE+bo3aoRLlA847DYMXbFJupAIE1HY70rG1 b8M3iiGA3a+Q5+T1TVr3mVAl2Ue0y+JV2ijgHsfE9etMPeIrbF7BctAZeFZASj2HkuqG KPbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=I4nhM9KTYTLoFZz4BUi417N4wl3WbV4LNgkZ/M1M1es=; b=JCyxpRN7sX8xoXrsBR4/l3CQ+4cxXqxepwW1dZRXeU3HiqNCRCb/uUNWMgPClmsUbe S9WCk0LYmFD9k9Gj49756c5piMwPRyv/PwCQCCVdXKcpLl1+3TrNH6WZS/yVV5cQmFq5 mjWmKEj5Tps/i7p0dG5tv5gFWhLGC5fSf26TcozKKY15SvTLA/B3kJEAuAlkQjtjZBwr D31Snbudh6Q2SbBljKJjZQ3CpLoEbexKjsB0m6aXrjcPedyxQbacigfR4FzujtaSEtsz Mi1GWktcoLV1wkZFa9dgNU8oQFS08+QV1PQq7ZPAxswXkvymC92WAQtW0i26pSvUtSUg JZ+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVO3PQkONZcXp5kMprJe+GW8V2y8Z3VNuti+AwFBGsH+jG/A9CP duki8NvldPJDqcOtnZgIUK4ON1InRpIBv+2/c9+hNCe8
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCW0GAW33T7UaUzIAdK3lRfPH9dqNPD8rxt9Wo8oxWHONDcda3nDbuD7AOAYjNIeyxFrzCYJHJ8Od/xIOwu0rE=
X-Received: by 10.157.59.102 with SMTP id z93mr13589891otb.222.1507217349761; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.19.199 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: noloader@gmail.com
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 11:29:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8mNMunTGb1bDLufFV9Cbpke_BCRT+xDN2wGTBF4=Gx9pQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/ycDfAtQw9BTheeytwImWcNysooU>
Subject: [openpgp] Recommended default for SHA3-based signatures
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:29:12 -0000
Hi Everyone, Regarding https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-jivsov-openpgp-sha3-01.txt and the SHA3 support, which SHA3 algorithm does OpenPGP recommend as the default for interoperability? I am trying to determine which size causes the least amount of discomfort with respect to SHA3-based interop. I suspect it is SHA3-256, but the project might promote a different size with long term goals in mind. Thanks in advance. Jeff
- [openpgp] Recommended default for SHA3-based sign… Jeffrey Walton