[OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 05 April 2025 20:16 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ops-dir@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ops-dir@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B362A17EF2E9; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Ypz-bgg1siu; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:16:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03F617EF2DF; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 13:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 535KGXBW009813; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 21:16:33 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D187E4604A; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 21:16:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C527746043; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 21:16:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 5 Apr 2025 21:16:32 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 535KGVIe030966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 5 Apr 2025 21:16:32 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Susan Hares' <shares@ndzh.com>, ops-dir@ietf.org
References: <174380033587.152146.18179483825717724498@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg>
In-Reply-To: <174380033587.152146.18179483825717724498@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 21:16:31 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <027601dba667$9f7467d0$de5d3770$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQKzR0zFto+E8vUG0cWYdfzcNV31TbHmOuWw
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=3t8NtB527BoCrj21VCh9bod7GKxfuIwAsb15ZsyjmnM=; b=KvC di5DbUNuhbXLFI2sOEvx7/SPibZV8vieXgMG6C7kvc56wejfjOkmngC0u1DgHb7q gqUak0QpzNVXE3c1DE6fHns5MOYzCq4iTBXtrQjxjld4shhsAcMlJdniZ+1AMBLM /Mil8F4N1cVZzYDeWsyU6WYCmVBlf8bSZz2sEUufDDK3zL1zZM0e1DCzBhArwrIJ XEdJwqgkAucwsnxrubzEa7UPgYY47I0wY6YX8zgvfsZpUQTMSQ4MEyF4n+9eGCv4 Tb/eQF8PNBrBp5AGmTEkTX8Uq0bJGICJhgeSbUi8CUow2GlZUUsE31bIgxXLy9WB hzggUIrVtkqBEtApvIA==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1006-29098.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--9.513-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--9.513-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1006-29098.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--9.513000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 9zTThWtzImvxIbpQ8BhdbI61Z+HJnvsOdmWMDQajOiKgo0DxI7WwdDb1 0B588b8h3Rq1qtW57uPoJq8ti1bIKa2VGmwFzbwzxDiakrJ+SpkZskwWqoib3L7LhjjzshwBpC0 eXDBJ89F9zDUmsILYeqD8el0Bdzuop59IpIK1eReqFx2c/3V5cWUfjhTZG7XaW0iRBs+g9bejxY yRBa/qJQYnglAWdCYbh9eWnlL1x8DdB/CxWTRRu25FeHtsUoHuYGGNB11IfIl2ZXSWMjogUvYLs F+JRHPQdgDJ0MObOYZLhb8xGEnVfg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Message-ID-Hash: TZWHZQLQJ3VSELLPLLCMGXSHBETCE2IJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: TZWHZQLQJ3VSELLPLLCMGXSHBETCE2IJ
X-MailFrom: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ops-dir.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt.all@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Subject: [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04
List-Id: Ops Directorate <ops-dir.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/9a2iaLw5ZX9S2ZO5MrappuhQe2w>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ops-dir>
List-Help: <mailto:ops-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ops-dir-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ops-dir@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ops-dir-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ops-dir-leave@ietf.org>
Thanks, Sue. I think the discussion of previous VPN solutions in the Introduction is just providing some background examples. The document is not about other VPN solutions. And we certainly don't intend to set up a beauty contest between different approaches. Cheers, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sent: 04 April 2025 21:59 To: ops-dir@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt.all@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org Subject: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04 Document: draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt Title: The IPv6 VPN Service Destination Option Reviewer: Susan Hares Review result: Has Issues This is an OPS-DIR review for management issues. The Standardized VPN technologies do not include SR routing and the SRv6 header changes. Why are these not considered? If they are not to be considered, perhaps the authors should add this to the list of things ignored in the experiment. It seems odd since the authors clearly have expertise to add this into the draft.
- [OPS-DIR]Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6ma… Susan Hares via Datatracker
- [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Adrian Farrel
- [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf… mohamed.boucadair