[OPS-DIR]Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04

Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 04 April 2025 20:58 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <174380033587.152146.18179483825717724498@dt-datatracker-64c5c9b5f9-hz6qg>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 13:58:55 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: MWFI6AR34OZTC4JKUOO3MYDZL3TJPTZ6
CC: draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt.all@ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Reply-To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: [OPS-DIR]Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt-04
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/F7iMjOQrs1KeownQf6ojEO0XNvc>

Document: draft-ietf-6man-vpn-dest-opt
Title: The IPv6 VPN Service Destination Option
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Has Issues

This is an OPS-DIR review for management issues.

The Standardized VPN technologies do not include SR routing and the SRv6 header
changes. Why are these not considered?

If they are not to be considered, perhaps the authors should add this to the
list of things ignored in the experiment.

It seems odd since the authors clearly have expertise to add this into the
draft.

[OPS-DIR]Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-6ma… Susan Hares via Datatracker
[OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf… Adrian Farrel
[OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf… mohamed.boucadair