IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis-01.txt

"Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu> Mon, 19 October 2015 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=77346405dc=uri@ll.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922411A8A75 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FUZZY_CREDIT=1.678, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8DQNUcVoDpax for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.ll.mit.edu (MX1.LL.MIT.EDU [129.55.12.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5FD1A8A79 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LLE2K10-HUB01.mitll.ad.local (LLE2K10-HUB01.mitll.ad.local) by mx1.ll.mit.edu (unknown) with ESMTP id t9JGhpIu014587; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:46:16 -0400
From: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRChlVKo8M4jljT0KQAGjg6aSJVJ5zBqCA
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:44:37 +0000
Message-ID: <D24A9604.20C16%uri@ll.mit.edu>
References: <20151013134530.1812.97650.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56245AE1.405@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56245AE1.405@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821
x-originating-ip: [172.25.177.187]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha256"; boundary="B_3528103465_145400752"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151, 1.0.33, 0.0.0000 definitions=2015-10-19_14:2015-10-15,2015-10-19,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1508030000 definitions=main-1510190287
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/07HLdXir34YbYVMOUxrRGw0ujIg>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-gont-opsawg-firewalls-analysis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 16:46:20 -0000

On 10/18/15, 22:52 , "OPSAWG on behalf of Brian E Carpenter"
<opsawg-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hmm. I've finally made time to read this draft, to find out what the
>fuss is about...

:-)

>Overall, this draft seems to me to be an opinion piece. That's fine of
>course,
>everyone is entitled to state their opinion, but I'm not sure that it
>helps
>the IETF to know what to do next. It reads more like a CCR editorial
>article
>or an Independent Submission RFC.

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email