IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] Splitting of draft-ietf-behave-mib

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Sat, 18 October 2014 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981131A020B; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:46:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AGmTYT0cg50H; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501CE1A0069; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 12:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CD7825EF4; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:46:06 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xBVK5EqYfd-n; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:46:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from golem.sobco.com (golem.sobco.com [136.248.127.162]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23E78825EE7; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:46:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5442C124.8070904@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:45:45 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AD96D9D9-D00C-4BBC-AED0-42717B8A3A61@sobco.com>
References: <5442C124.8070904@gmail.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/2s7R7_99TCSJXduIrSr-qsi7580
Cc: draft-ietf-behave-mib.authors@tools.ietf.org, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Splitting of draft-ietf-behave-mib
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:46:01 -0000

sounds cleaner

Scott

On Oct 18, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote:

> draft-ietf-behave-mib (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib) has been undergoing AD-sponsored process. I have completed setting up an issue tracker based on the issues raised in the Behave Trac tickets #16-19 and the 45 comments generated by David Harrington in his detailed review. The entry point to that issuee tracker is at
> 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/behave/trac/wiki/PostIssueTracker
> 
> One of the issues was procedural. The current draft deprecates all of the objects in the original NAT MIB module (RFC 4008) and then goes on to define new objects using the same MIB module name. There seems to be agreement that instead, there will be one I-D for the deprecation of NAT-MIB and a second I-D to define NAT-MIB-V2. RFC 4008 will be declared Historic.
> 
> Do I have the procedure right, and are there any other comments?
> 
> Tom Taylor
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email